Questions tagged [review-audits]

Test items in review queues that are designed to help new reviewers hone their moderation skills, while nudging more experienced users that don't seem to be paying close attention to what they're reviewing.

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
10
votes
1answer
214 views

This audit looks completely obvious. Is it really needed?

Has the AI developed a sense of humour now ? Does such an audit serve any purpose ?
352
votes
1answer
11k views

What are review tests (audits) and how do they work?

I recently received this rather amusing message while reviewing a user's first post: Congratulations! This was only a test, designed to make sure you were paying attention. This post has already been ...
26
votes
1answer
431 views

Questions about review testing

While reviewing, I sometimes get test-results. Flagging them typically will show the following: This was only a test, designed to make sure you were paying attention. The post has already been ...
114
votes
2answers
3k views

“STOP! Look and Listen” audit tricked me

I have noticed this "STOP! Look and Listen" message when the system audits you by having you review something to check how you respond. However, this audit came up and I was tricked. I wanted to up ...
9
votes
0answers
211 views

Why was this answer from Jon Skeet “automatically flagged as low-quality”? [duplicate]

Possible Duplicate: Review-beta: Obviously good answer in low-quality Why was this answer from Jon Skeet "automatically flagged as low-quality"? Link: https://stackoverflow.com/review/low-...
3
votes
0answers
70 views

“Severe quality issues” screen on already deleted message [duplicate]

Possible Duplicate: Review-beta: Obviously good answer in low-quality Upon reviewing some messages, I received the "This post has severe quality issues" teaching screen. I guess I've let ...
80
votes
3answers
2k views

Improving the Quality of Reviews: Project Honeypot

There has been a lot of discussion/complaints about the quality of reviews. Many have noted that a large (maybe even a majority) of reviews are rubber stamps in pursuit of a Steward badge (especially ...
40
votes
5answers
696 views

Delete informative code-only answers? Not!

Since we emptied the giant LQ backlog, I've been given the TSA screener treatment a few times. Which is to say, I've been presented with an answer, asked to react to it, and then told that: it was a ...
8
votes
0answers
126 views

“This post has severe quality issues.” in low-quality review has no means for feedback? [duplicate]

While review posts in the "low-quality" queue in the new review system, I encountered a short post consisting of a link along with a somewhat terse explanation. Here is the question, but the post has ...
65
votes
1answer
1k views

Review-beta: Obviously good answer in low-quality

Today I came across an OBVIOUSLY good answer in /review. It had 7 upvotes, contained lists, paragraphs of explanation, and well-applied sample code. It was also moderately long. How does a question ...
30
votes
4answers
390 views

Is anyone monitoring people rejecting good edits or approving bad ones?

Right now I can say "good" or "bad" to a proposed edit at my discretion, but is anyone able to see this decision and moderate it? I recently saw a good edit that I was going to approve, but when I ...

1
9 10 11 12
13