I think that it is definitely worth to cover this case in the FAQ, seeing there are people that come to ask about this [here on MSE](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/355505/suspension-on-personal-finance). It would be good to have this included in the FAQ, so it can be used as a duplicate target. Which is more helpful the just closing such question as off-topic.

We also should include this as people are seeking for "justice" when they feel they have been banned incorrectly. It would only be fair to offer them an option for appeal.

**What should be in the FAQ**

I think the comment section here perfectly captures what should be in the FAQ:

- A description in which cases a suspension like this is encountered (spam, sock puppetry)
- Contacting staff is the only appeal option
  - Such message is only useful when there is valuable content to be re-attributed to your account
  - In other cases it takes too long for staff to act upon such message. The ban expires faster. (Expectation management is crucial in this case)