A few ideas that should be implemented ASAP:

* closed as **not yet relevant** (for questions like the one you refer to)
* closed as **too nosy** (for [this][1])
* closed as **whining** ([you know the kind][6])
* closed as **wanting to turn Stack Overflow into a social networking site** (you probably don't need me to search for examples)
* closed as **Facebook Overflow** (as a shorter alternative to the previous one)
* closed as **unhelpful rant** ([for this][2]); automatically changed to "closed as **TL;DR**" if the markdown source exceeds two kilobytes
* closed as **kindergarten** ([here][3])
* closed as **too sophisticated for the simple minds of Meta** ([there][4])
* closed as **would require a seven pound user manual for Stack Overflow** ([ex.][5])
* closed as **huh?** (as a shorter alternative to one of the previous two [or both?])



  [1]: https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/817/what-kind-of-agreement-do-joel-and-jeff-really-have-is-this-public-info-closed
  [2]: https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/34902/stack-overflow-a-great-resource-on-first-inspection-a-community-of-trolls-naz
  [3]: https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/36413/iso-more-people-to-start-a-power-leveling-clan-for-so-closed
  [4]: https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/36723/so-should-validate-a-username-in-the-url-and-issue-a-redirect-on-mismatch-right
  [5]: https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/35347/have-downvotes-cost-more-to-be-refunded-when-a-comment-on-that-question-answer-g
  [6]: https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/34221/so-where-can-i-ask-developers-questions-closed