That was ***really*** disappointing.

If this whole Stack Exchange thing is going to be *community-driven*, then one and only one rule should apply to site proposals: if one of them can fulfill the requirements and clearly show a good community would follow it, then **it should be opened**, no matter how silly the SE staff thinks it could be.

The only exception to this policy could be is something is blatantly offensive and/or illegal... but this was definitely not the case.

---
Update:
-

I don't know who voted to close this questions as "noise or pointless", but I really don't think a discussion about

 - what can and can not be done in Stack Exchange,
 - whether having some fun is permitted here or severely censored,
 - and why a site proposal which had gained enough followers to made it halfway the  commitment phase has been abruptly closed

can be considered "pointless" at all.