Currently, [according to Waffles][1], answers or questions that have been "reviewed" are suppressed if more than 2 people have reviewed them.

This is obviously a a Good Thing <sup>TM</sup>, however, it does mean that if two people review a question or answer and then flag it as spam or offensive then it disppears from the review queue.

[This one is a good example][2]. It's only just been closed after 2 hours; mainly, I believe, because it disappeared from the `/review/first-answers` and `/review/late-answers` tabs.

This semi-defeats the point of these flags, which is to allow the community at large to remove [highly objectionable material][3] without the need for moderator intervention, for instance if there's not one logged on at that time to review offensive flags.

My [meta-tag:feature-request] is that if a majority of people reviewing a question or answer have marked it as spam, or offensive, then that post should not be removed from the `/review` tab.

The reason for the majority is to stop abusive flagging and / or to ensure that it is actually offensive. As two people are required to review something if one of them flags a post as offensive it will remain in the review list. If a further person reviews the post and does not flag it the post will be removed. If they do then it will stay.

  [1]: https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/75953/allow-marking-posts-as-reviewed-on-review-and-hide-them
  [2]: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1330399/redirecting-user-back-to-originally-desired-url-after-login/11358197#11358197
  [3]: https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/22174/how-does-the-offensive-flag-work