We've now implemented this. Obviously, my initial optimism in assuming folks who didn't feel strongly about voting would do something else useful was completely misguided. I was wrong, and I apologize sincerely for not realizing this sooner. 

I'm quickly souring ([again][1]) on the idea of allowing voting in these queues *at all*; not because of [the people who vote without reviewing at all][2], but because it's made it impractical to implement something that's been a staple in other queues: multiple reviewers per review item. Indeed, we badly need a locking mechanism to *prevent* multiple reviewers (3-4 votes on new posts can really break things), however implementing this will be tricky. 

So for now, we're adding a "No Action Needed" button. We'll be watching to see if it is effective in siphoning off folks with no real opinion on the posts they're reviewing. 

![No Action Needed][3]


  [1]: http://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/140405/why-is-voting-removed-from-new-review-system
  [2]: http://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/149621/the-current-review-system-encourages-fake-reviews-some-people-upvote-everything
  [3]: https://i.sstatic.net/1Oq2p.png