Well, I disagree that the author posted the question in good faith; at that point it's more like a "hostile witness".

IMHO, the title, as edited, did correctly express the intent of the post -- **the author was frustrated that [his personal shopping questions][1] can't be asked on Super User and Server Fault** -- and the author was actively trying to mask his intent by coming up with a [really generic title for a subsequent question][2] and pretending that wasn't the root cause of his frustration.

That said, since the author objected so strongly to the edit, I let it be.

[1]: http://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/51726/superuser-com-getting-useless-for-me
[2]: http://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/51771/asking-the-wrong-questions-vs-asking-at-the-wrong-site