The minimum-text body length does not even come ***close*** to fixing the issue. Here are some recent examples: * http://stackoverflow.com/q/12939089/497356 * http://stackoverflow.com/q/12939086/497356 * http://stackoverflow.com/q/12938475/497356 * http://stackoverflow.com/q/12938156/497356 * http://stackoverflow.com/q/12938137/497356 * http://stackoverflow.com/q/12937260/497356 * http://stackoverflow.com/q/12937252/497356 * http://stackoverflow.com/q/12935967/497356 * http://stackoverflow.com/q/12935954/497356 * http://stackoverflow.com/q/12935595/497356 * http://stackoverflow.com/q/12935518/497356 * http://stackoverflow.com/q/12935283/497356 (Bonus, two fiddles and no code) * http://stackoverflow.com/q/12934578/497356 * http://stackoverflow.com/q/12934423/497356 * http://stackoverflow.com/q/12934361/497356 * http://stackoverflow.com/q/12933418/497356 * http://stackoverflow.com/q/12933274/497356 * http://stackoverflow.com/q/12933168/497356 * http://stackoverflow.com/q/12933070/497356 * http://stackoverflow.com/q/12932836/497356 *(PS: This is an editing field day, please help out by adding the code to the questions themselves if you have a moment)* These *20 examples* took me a matter of minutes to find, and they've all been asked after 10-17-2012, when the "fix" should have been in place. Keep an eye on [these search results][1]. The majority of them exhibit the link-to-code-only problem. The accepted answer is not an acceptable solution. This needs to be addressed more aggresively. <hr /> **Proposed solution:** Okay I know this isn't perfect but maybe it'll give someone else an idea. How about simply not allowing users to post questions that include a link to a specified set of code-hosting sites (JSFiddle, IDEOne, etc.) and do not include any code? Is there ever a chance that a link to one of those sites and no code is actually a valid question? I don't think so. Wouldn't this be relatively easy to implement? [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/search?tab=newest&q=url:%22*jsfiddle.net/*%22%20is:question