Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
For questions about how jsFiddle is used on and linked from the Stack Exchange network. Not for asking about questions about jsFiddle.
10
votes
Prevent posts with links to jsfiddle and no code
But instead we could eliminate the need of systems like JSFiddle at all.
As for suggestions:
Some of us, use some patterns to annotate the type of coding in the answer like <! … -- language: lang-js -->, so may be we can use these and create an Sandbox to show the issue ourselves and not rely on jsfiddle or similar. …
4
votes
Why are answers with jsfiddle.net in body not allowed?
The main reason behind this is because of this question:
Prevent posts with links to jsfiddle and no code
That question post will answer What is the propose of this rule? …