Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Favorites infavorites:mine
infavorites:1234
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with Search options user 260841

Measurement of a user's contributions to the site, and the extent to which the community "trusts" that user with extra privileges.

6
votes
(It's 5 rep, not 15) The problem is, if you didn't require 5 rep, there would be more people abusing the privilege that people who want to use it legitimately like yourself! Looking at other highly …
answered Apr 2 '15 by ᔕᖺᘎᕊ
21
votes
This was caused by a user who has abused the system (quite unnecessarily) by accepting and unnaccepting answers for specific people. He has been suspended for 30 days now. The people who have lost r …
answered May 15 '15 by ᔕᖺᘎᕊ
11
votes
The only time this will ever happen is for Tag Wiki's. On non-beta sites you need 20k rep to edit tag wiki's without approval from somebody else. You can approve the tag wiki's at 5k. I think it mak …
answered Jan 6 '15 by ᔕᖺᘎᕊ
9
votes
I don't think there should be any penalty for not rewarding your bounty because a bounty is primarily meant for the bounty starter to get some more views, and visibility. The actual reward part is t …
answered Nov 16 '15 by ᔕᖺᘎᕊ
7
votes
My doubt is regarding how this looks in the reputation history, as the serial downvotes look really weird in the reputation tab of my profile. Today, most people give reference to their Stack … Overflow profile to recruiters to show what skills they have, but this history in the reputation tab looks odd and might cast a bad light towards me if the recruiter does not know what serial voting is …
answered May 25 '15 by ᔕᖺᘎᕊ
5
votes
0answers
When hovering over a site's logo in the 'Achievements' dropdown box where your net rep change is negative, it says (emphasis mine): You earned -5 reputation Now, I agree that isn't wrong, but … it doesn't sound right. It kind of feels like the system's mocking me (yes - it bothers me that much!). Can it be changed to check whether the net change is -ve and if it is, then say: You lost 5 reputation
asked May 30 '15 by ᔕᖺᘎᕊ
4
votes
I was the commenter talking to you. Sorry for not getting back to you, but yes, you need 50 rep to use the other flag options, and 15 rep to get the options you do currently. As said here: The rea …
answered Jan 25 '15 by ᔕᖺᘎᕊ
1
vote
The tracker is right. You only have 8 days: As seen by this graph (the line is 200). Where are the 2 days with exactly 200 rep? I only see one. The next closest is 195. You've miscounted :)
answered May 16 '15 by ᔕᖺᘎᕊ
5
votes
more reputation for a significant helpful change. I don't think there should be a mechanism of this sort because: people will probably abuse the feature people will start making more minor edits …
answered Mar 27 '15 by ᔕᖺᘎᕊ