For questions about how historical locks work.
What is a Historical Lock?
A historical lock is a mechanism by which moderators can mark posts as historical artifacts. Questions which are historically locked feature the following post notice:
locked by Moderator♦ Mar 16 at 20:01
This question exists because it has historical significance, but it is not considered a good, on-topic question for this site, so please do not use it as evidence that you can ask similar questions here. This question and its answers are frozen and cannot be changed. More info: FAQ.
What is the purpose of a Historical Lock?
A historical lock preserves older content that was very popular when it was originally posted, but is now off-topic or otherwise out of scope for the site it is posted on. Historically locking a post ends the debate over whether a question should be kept on the site or deleted, and is often the final state of a question that has been deleted and undeleted more than once.
How are questions affected by historical locking?
In addition to the post notice being prominently displayed, posts which are historically locked are "frozen in time;" they cannot be voted on, answered, edited or commented. Historically-locked questions are omitted from normal question lists (those on the home page, /questions, and the various per-tag lists), but can still be found by searching for words in the post or title (via either site-search or Google, etc). The visual appearance of the entire post is altered by removal of the voting arrows from the question and all answers.
Note that historical locked questions on meta sites are not hidden in this manner, though their answers are still frozen in the same fashion.
When is it appropriate to lock a question for historical reasons?
Questions can be historically locked when:
- The post is Off-Topic or Not Constructive, and
- The post is stellar, in spite of its off-topic nature, and
- There are a large number of views, upvotes and inbound links on the post, and
- The post is contentious; i.e. it has been closed and reopened at least once, or deleted and undeleted at least once
When is it not appropriate to historically-lock a question?
Questions should not be historically locked if they:
- Are being actively maintained, or
- Have little or no redeeming value.
A good rule of thumb: If the question does not minimally meet Jeff Atwood's 3rd rule in the "We Hate Fun Here" blog post, it's probably not a good candidate for historical locking. The third rule is:
Does this question teach me anything that could make me better at my job? Can I learn something from it?
How do I request a historical lock on a question?
Flag the question for moderator attention, with the "custom description" option. In the flag description, explain why you think the post should be historically locked. A moderator will evaluate the question using the criteria outlined above, and will either lock the question, or decline your flag with an explanation.
Alternatively, if you want to try and gain more community support for the question, or contest the moderator decision, you can post a question here on Meta.
This content was imported directly from the FAQ page for historical locks:
What is a historical lock, and what is it used for?