479

What is voting fraud? Voting fraud is the systematic voting against correct voting rationales. Fraud most often happens with a single user continually voting (up or down) on many of your posts within a short period of time. This is not considered normal behavior and the system will not allow it. If mass voting continues to happen between two certain IP ...


232

All sounds nice, but you're still missing a point that I think should be addressed. Currently, when things get deleted, they just disappear from your history. That's not very helpful, especially concerning reputation. When my reputation randomly drops by 40, it would be nice to be able to see that in my history. Would it be possible to make this change show ...


129

TL;DR: Please don't just try to cure the symptoms when curing the cancer is this simple. Retract reputation gained from questions that are closed (or that were closed within a certain time frame, starting with the creation of the question), and you'll most likely fix this whole rep-system-abuse that's been going on for way too long. When I first read the ...


112

As a matter of fact you can. All it costs you is quality answers or quality questions. Heck, some people even do quality edits for reputation. Sign up now and we'll even throw in 100 rep when you associate your account on any other SE site if you hit 200 rep on any site, ABSOLUTELY FREE! And yes that's the secret. Use the network as it's meant to be used.


102

This was our screw-up, and preventing large impact deletes like this will be an addition to the code on our side sometime this week. For now I've gone through the database and manually undone the delete action on this user's votes, which is the net impact that should have happened if they were moved to the community user...our normal process. Your rep ...


84

I too would like to see this implemented. @Oded's response to a different question lays out the SE reasoning: We want to let you know about good things as soon as they happen - that's what our real-time notifications are for. Negative reputation changes are... well... negative. So we are not in a hurry to let you know about them. I strongly ...


80

Sorry, but you're making a false assumption here. The "m" is not for "millions" (that would be "M"), but for morpfloggles. One morpfloggle is 1,003,214. Thus you have precisely 6.6m rep, to the 5th digit. We're just not displaying trailing zeros.


76

I'd like to float a modified version of this idea as a 30k (10k beta) privilege. Problem statement Stack Exchange sites (and especially Stack Overflow) intimidate new users who might become exceptional contributors if only they got over the hump of asking and answering questions. Meanwhile, top users have plenty of sticks to correct bad behavior from new ...


73

I've skimmed through your questions and answers, and I've seen some easily fixable problems: Always provide context for links Whenever you include a link for reference in one of your posts make sure to add a short summary of the main points of the link. There are two reasons for that, the official and the real one. The official is that links sometimes ...


69

It looks like this was serial upvoting to me. Here's the vote you have recently received: That's 7 upvotes you received within 60 seconds. That's an average of 1 vote every 8.5741428 seconds. I am not a mod on SO so I can't see the details, but if all those votes were from a single user, then that's serial upvoting and those votes are not valid. The system ...


69

This feature request should be revisited now that there are a couple of SE sites (Code Golf and Puzzling) where being able to give a bounty to an excellent question would be a nice feature. It was recently asked if certain sites could be changed to award 10 rep points per question upvote instead of 5. The response was that it wouldn't really be possible to ...


68

It depends if you're up for a little indoctrination or not... I think that, as a user around that sort of rep, you understand that questions sometimes get closed, or reopened. You're maybe trying to emulate (or fight against) the people who've been around longer voting on this. In other words, you understand something of the site. Why not grant the view ...


68

This was an unintentional slip-up. We were fixing some Google crawler errors for deleted user cards on questions/answers and a set of brackets got missed in the code path that renders schema.org attributes. That meant that this: RenderSchema ? @"<span class=""d-none"" itemprop=""name"">" + UserToShow?.ToString() ?? name + "</span>" : "" ...


65

Yeah... This seems like a good idea. The term has moved from its original jocular uses to something considerably more mean-spirited. I suspect most folks using the term now have some sort of nasty boogieman in mind rather than good ol' Marc Gravell. And when folks here are more concerned about what other people think of them than they are about programming, ...


63

You have a reputation of 8 now on Stack Overflow; you need 50 to comment. You could do that by; Correcting the grammar of either questions or answers. To do so, click the edit link by the entry. Rephrase poorly expressed needs. For many, English is not their native tongue. You need 21 more approved edits to gain the 42 more rep you need to make it to 50. ...


61

So do we do this in SQL? Well, not really. We query to see if you're at the daily rep cap via SQL and make some decisions based on that, but we don't determine what reputation value you should have from that...it'd be a little crazy. If you want a detailed answer, keep reading. First, credit goes to the entire team here, I didn't write the original rep ...


60

Until you reach 2,000 reputation, your edits have to be approved or rejected. Only if they are approved you gain the +2 reputation. There is also a cap on the reputation that can be earned this way. Once you've had 500 edits accepted - that's 1,000 points - you don't earn any more reputation.


58

I operated a second account for some time because I was curious to find out whether low-reputation users are really treated much differently than high-reputation users. (Don't worry, the sock puppet never even glanced at anything contributed by my main account.) My - of course subjective - impressions from that were: low-rep users get more scrutiny on ...


58

Sites There are three main types of privilege thresholds (sorted from high to low): Stack Overflow and graduated sites with a design (example) public betas and non-designed sites (example) private betas and this Harvard University site Some sites have a unique privilege (level) schema: Ask Patents Area 51 (scroll down to "What is reputation?") The three ...


55

As far as I can tell, this is not how deletion of such user accounts is supposed to happen. The procedure has been outlined by SE developer in an answer to similar question as follows: When we delete highly active users upon their request (i.e. they no longer wish to participate in Stack Exchange), we preserve their up/down/accepted votes by moving them ...


54

I know we're kind of in the later stages of this, but can we update how tag wiki reputation is displayed in the reputation history? Currently, it looks like this: This is, obviously, not very specific. You have to click through to see what tag wiki (or excerpt) it's talking about. Can we get the tag wiki's title and the "excerpt" keyword (for those it ...


54

No, reputation is not the site's currency. It is not a means of payment. It at most is a rough indication of the community's trust in your contributions over time. You can buy answers with it with bounties. No you can't. You don't buy answers with a bounty. You bring your question to the attention of others with a bounty. If there's anything you're ...


52

The first thing that came to my mind was that it was my answer to the question "User was removed" that earned me -10. I actually searched on Stack Overflow to find that question. The second thing that confused me: what user was removed? And why do I care if a user was removed? A link, a calculation, and a description is probably not required, but the ...


52

It's time... ...it's time to keep the promise made three months ago: we'll start looking at increasing the number of close votes based on rep You seem to be blaming users for unnecessary rudeness and trying to cut their ways to express it. That may be true and right, but if you think of it the root cause for their attitude may lie elsewhere. For ...


51

I, personally, think it's completely irrational to LOSE reputation points just because a question you answered was deleted! If the answer was deleted, or if a question you asked was deleted, then it makes sense. However, if I answer a question, and it gets any votes (1 or 100 - doesn't matter), and then the question gets deleted, you're basically saying ...


49

Cross site moderation If you're a moderator that should send shivers down your spine. Thought finding sock puppets and voting rings was bad enough? Now you have 100 sites on which your voting ring could be centered. In theory it can be easy to find if someone gives bounties in exchange for upvotes on one site. But what if Bob gives Alice a bounty on UX for ...


Only top voted, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible