16
I agree with Blue, in that it's "unfair and unprofessional to make previously suspended candidates fill up their nominations and answer the gigantic questionnaire, and then tell them that they're not allowed." And that's why, when a user is disallowed to run in an election, we show 'em this message:
Granted, the user can still decide to run, and fill in the ...
16
Thanks for writing this up. To reiterate what I said in the Physics chat: it's rather unfair and unprofessional to make previously suspended candidates fill up their nominations and answer the gigantic questionnaire, and then tell them that they're not allowed, just a couple of hours before the election begins. Such users should be blocked and clearly ...
1
This question is constantly repeated, which I think itself is indication of a conveyance issue with the way the error is phrased.
What do we think about changing the text of this error to "Edits must be at least 6 characters for users under 2000 reputation; is there something else to improve in this post?"
This is so it's clear this isn't a universal ...
Only top voted, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible
