Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 155 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

If you use an @notification in chat messages it will notify the corresponding user with a small circle (or snowman) on their gravatar and (if enabled) a sound effect.

Now, when you have notified a user that way they will be notified again if you edit the message containing the @notification. I don't think this behaviour is optimal. In most cases I don't really want to ping the user again; I just want to correct some small typo.

I suggest to change the behaviour to not repeat the ping when posts are edited.

share|improve this question
16  
But I care when you fix typos. – BoltClock's a Unicorn Dec 13 '11 at 17:42
1  
Declining this since it's really more trouble than worth it (we can't just unconditionally not re-ping, there'd have to be some sort of logic as to "does this look like a major edit?"). And the majority seems to agree. – balpha Jul 23 '12 at 14:44
    
@balpha plus some of us forget to ping people and go back and edit to ping for the first time! Not that I'd ever forget to do something. – Ben Brocka Jul 23 '12 at 15:11
    
@balpha In that case, the user can just delete the message and send a new one. Another option would be to ask the user whether to re-ping, with the default as off. This wouldn't deter the pranksters, but it would really help. – Hosch250 Feb 24 '15 at 4:53

Implementing this would also remove notification in the case where you do want to ping the person again. I don't think it's worth it.

If you really don't want to ping the person again for a minor typo, you have the option of just living with the typo.

share|improve this answer
3  
I never had an occasion where I wanted to ping a user again for the same, edited message. I find the behaviour just unexpected, it's confusing to find some phantom ping, cause by some edit. – Mad Scientist Dec 13 '11 at 17:54
    
@Fabian I don't have much else to say beyond "I've had an occasion where I wanted to ping a user again". :) – Adam Lear Dec 13 '11 at 17:56
2  
I'd think the larger issue is, implementing this would prevent pinging another individual if, say, you accidentally pinged the wrong person in the first place. – Grace Note Dec 13 '11 at 17:59
    
@Grace it could check if the notifications changed after the edit, if that would be worth the dev-time is another question, of course. – Mad Scientist Dec 13 '11 at 18:06
1  
@Fabian I don't think the pings are much of an annoyance, since you can just click on them and it will track exactly which message(s) caused the ping. – NullUserException อ_อ Dec 13 '11 at 18:11
2  
@Fabian An edit may also change the content non-trivially, in which case it may be nice to be notified. – balpha Dec 13 '11 at 18:33
1  
If you really do want to ping the person again, you have the option of just...pinging them again. You always have the option of pinging someone; what you can't get around is not pinging them when the system forces you to, so it should avoid that if possible – Michael Mrozek Jul 23 '12 at 17:19

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .