What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 131 Stack Exchange communities.

Currently, the number of "votes cast" excludes votes on deleted content. Once something gets deleted that you voted on, that vote vanishes from your stats. This of course happens frequently especially with down-votes - if you're a good voter, stuff you downvote often ends up getting deleted.

Seeing as the idea behind the public display of total votes you've cast is to encourage voting, is this really fair?

Also, doesn't it distort greatly all voting stats, especially when looking at candidates for moderator elections and such?

share|improve this question
    
Perhaps deletion should be entirely replaced by hiding things instead. As in, keep all the records but censor the "deleted" stuff. You could even bring something back to life/visibility if you thought it was unfairly deleted or something. Anyway, I agree, not that I know anything at all... –  user826788 Jan 4 '12 at 11:35
7  
@user that's how it happens at the moment. 10k+ users can see deleted content –  Pëkka Jan 4 '12 at 11:36
2  
For linking purposes: Eeeek! I'm missing 650 downvotes, and 300 upvotes –  Tim Stone Jan 4 '12 at 11:57
3  
Keeping them around could facilitate a gold badge that takes a couple of years to get as well. –  Tim Post Jan 28 '12 at 7:57

3 Answers 3

up vote 50 down vote accepted
+100

Starting with the next build, votes on deleted posts will be included in the profile counts. This will also apply to the various voting badges to match: Civic Duty, Electorate, Suffrage, Vox Populi. Also, the badge progress on review should remain accurate.

Downvoting bad content (which usually ends up being deleted) is something we want to encourage. Penalizing you for a good practice here is definitely not our intention, so we're making this change for great justice.

share|improve this answer
5  
Coooool! Thanks for this. –  Pëkka Feb 21 '12 at 22:36
13  
So, uh, I think you guys screwed up somewhere. –  BoltClock's a Unicorn Feb 22 '12 at 22:30
1  
Ohhh boy, I like this! I just almost doubled my downvote count from 2,160 to 4,149 –  Pëkka Feb 22 '12 at 22:44
    
@BoltClock'saUnicorn - yeah, those badges will be corrected in just a minute... –  Nick Craver Feb 22 '12 at 22:48
1  
Aww, for 10 happy minutes I was a proud undeserved holder of Vox Populi here. +1 for quick fix, though. –  Daniel Fischer Feb 22 '12 at 22:54
    
@NickCraver So when do these votes show up in the all-time count? Or will they? I see them on my profile, but not on the users/voters page. –  Ward Feb 22 '12 at 23:33
    
@NickCraver Yeah, as usual on Friday, the total number of votes shown here: serverfault.com/users?tab=voters&filter=all went down. Shouldn't the total go up at some point to show all votes, including on deleted posts? –  Ward Feb 25 '12 at 1:55
    
@Ward - this will be fixed in the next build...sorry, missed this, busy writing some open source stuff for you guys :) –  Nick Craver Feb 26 '12 at 11:02
    
Did you consider making clear how many of those votes were on posts that have meanwhile been deleted? (I guess you saw I am a hater because of people do not understand voting patterns properly. Though I never look at those figures, I also never realized that votes on deleted posts are included there.) –  Arjan Feb 11 at 22:19
    
@Arjan not really, a global count suffices. Rarely do people want or need a breakdown, that's a top 0.01% feature that most would find confusing. –  Nick Craver Feb 12 at 0:48

Rather than including them in the normal vote count I would rather see votes on deleted questions/answers recorded as a separate total of "ghost votes" (perhaps with their own badges as Tim Post seems to be suggesting in the comments?)

My logic here is that deleted things no longer count toward reputation, so they shouldn't count toward the (normal) vote-count driven stuff. At the same time we do want to encourage people to vote more, so why not have some really difficult-to-get badges to reward people for voting on stuff that got erased from history? (After all, we're keeping it in the database anyway!)

share|improve this answer

Speaking as someone who votes a lot, yeah, it's a bit of a bummer to cast 40 votes in a day and see your total only go up by 30.

I don't know that very many people would go to the extent I did of setting up a spreadsheet (so I could tell whether it was votes this week, this month, or whenever, that were disappearing) to track their votes, but before I had the spreadsheet it was really bothering me when I thought votes were disappearing. At least now I know they're disappearing and I can ask questions (like I did) to try to learn more.

As was mentioned on the "Eek!" question, the site is still "benefiting" from votes on deleted questions, so I heartily endorse including them in the count.

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .