What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 133 Stack Exchange communities.

First, a foreword: I've searched rigorously for a question that addresses the same concern that I'm about to detail, but the closest I've came is this question. I certainly hope others understand that this is meant to address the same problem that has been addressed before, but from a different perspective. Read this with that in mind.

With that out of the way, let's get to the crux of the problem: the conflict in domain terminology that plagues the Stack Exchange network. This isn't a gripe about the definition of an 'unanswered question' (in fact, I think it makes sense to define it as a question with no up-voted answer, since such a question might as well have no answer at all), but instead is a gripe about how there seems to be 2 slightly different definitions of an unanswered question. For the sake of argument, we're going to go into this with the mindset of a brand new Stack Overflow user, one who is ready to help others with their programming problems. We are going to reference these two screenshots throughout, each of which is slightly different (and will be embedded when need be, but have been linked in order to keep this question slightly shorter):

The 'Unanswered' section versus the 'Unanswered' tab.

Now, let's begin:

I've just joined the community. I'm somewhat familiar with how SO works already (as most people who program probably are, thanks to the awesome SEO), so I have a grasp on the Q\A system already. I am ready to help, but I figure I could make a greater impact if I helped older questions that have yet to be answered. The problem is already appearant: which button do I click? The 'Unanswered' section is literally right above the 'Unanswered' tab from the 'Questions' section:

Unanswered section right above unanswered tab

Thinking logically, the giant section button is obviously given more precedence, and will probably be given more details, so I will click this one first. The first thing to note is that this section is done well. It is very quickly communicated to the user what is meant by an 'unanswered question', thanks to this:

Unanswered section: 720,911 questions with **no upvoted answers**

This element is prominent in the page, and defines the domain term of an unanswered question, which one would usually assume meant is a question with 0 answers. This is very good, and helps to avoid common confusion. The sub-tabs then expand on this, which make it easy to find a plethora of questions in need of quality answers: questions hot off the presses ('Newest'), questions that I might know how to answer ('My tags'), great questions in general ('Votes'), or questions that really don't have any answers ('No answers'). An important point here is the last tab: it solidifies the definition of an 'unanswered question'. Overall, the 'Unanswered' section exemplifies a great way to define a domain term.

So, let's rewind a bit to see the issue once again. We're back where we started, so we don't know the definition of an unanswered question. This time, our logic is that an unanswered question is still just a question: it would make sense that they would be a tab within the 'Questions' section. This time, however, there is nothing on this page to suggest an alternate definition of an 'unanswered' question. To me it still means a question with no answers, and I will not understand the true definition until I go to the 'Unanswered' section, where I then have to re-learn something I thought I already understood. This, right here, also baffles me to no end:

Unanswered tab: 720,911 questions

First, this shows the same number of questions as the 'Unanswered' section, despite a different definition of such. Without the previous subtext clarification, my mind assumes the natural meaning of the words, and that makes things worse yet: It'll take me longer to get 'corrected'; I likely won't notice the alternate subtext, since I would have assumed that the two areas of the site were essentially the same. the problem with this is that, next time I visit the site, I might pick the 'Unanswered' tab instead, and I'll have to learn an alternative definition of what an 'Unanswered' question is.

Anyway, let's continue, since it gets worse: I have literally no idea how these questions are sorted. The title still says 'All Questions', and some questions have my tags, but most don't:

Confusion from sort order

Upon further examination, I can tell that questions are sorted by vote counts, but this takes actual mental operation, as opposed to seemingly-subconcious understanding from the 'Unanswered' section. A big step down in user experience. Also, it seems confusing to figure out how to sort by tags, and takes experimentation. And yes, I do know how to do it, but it just seems rougher than the alternative of the simple tab under the 'Unanswered' section.

That's all I've got, (and wow, this came out longer than expected), so here's a brief summary/TL;DR for the quick-scrollers:

  • The 'Unanswered' section is awesome
    • It very quickly defines domain terminology to the end user
    • It has a simpler means of sorting
    • It is more capable
  • The 'Unanswered' tab is confusing
    • It is inconsistent with the domain term of 'Unanswered question'
    • It may require me to re-learn something I was confident I knew
    • It is (relatively) hard to find questions that I know how to answer

I'm curious on other people's opinions on the system as it stands, and I'm also curious to hear some potential solutions on how to fix this issue, or if others think it should be considered an issue at all. My argument already had one major flaw in it (thanks to slugster for pointing out my misunderstanding of the 'Unanswered' tab), so I'm curious about any other flaws my argument has, as well.

share|improve this question
    
Do you mean this to be a feature request to add the words "with no upvoted answers" to the unanswered tab? –  ben is uǝq backwards Aug 27 '12 at 10:40
    
I think it's more of a discussion question; it's about how the two similar aspects of the site provide very different first-impressions. I guess it could be considered a feature request as well, but I left out my opinion in favor of eating those of others'. I might provide my own take as an answer when I wake up tomorrow. –  Kyle Lacy Aug 27 '12 at 10:45
    
All three questions in your snapshot of the unanswered tab have no answers, making it a less than ideal example for your discussion. Without that I have to visit the tab myself to make sure what you say is true, and I'll probably never make it back to your question.... –  slugster Aug 27 '12 at 11:24
    
That's a good point; although I suspect that pay interest in the question are already familiar with most aspects of SO. For right now, I'll leave it as-is, but I may go back and fix it later. –  Kyle Lacy Aug 27 '12 at 15:42

1 Answer 1

When talking about the unanswered tab you said:

I see questions with answers! Dumb website, not actually doing what I asked!

But when I go to the same location, I see dead people questions with no answers, just like the tab promised. A quick and totally scientific sample of four of the 14424 pages showed that all the questions had no answers.

So it appears you have your example slightly mixed up - the unanswered button contains questions that have answers. But as you point out, it has a big fat qualifying statement next to the count. Immediately to the left of that counter is another tab that is titled no answers which gives you the exact same view as the previously mentioned unanswered tab.

So I would say there is no problem - the domain definitions seem to be all in order.

share|improve this answer
    
You're right, I'm pretty sure I mixed up that part. The problem I wanted to point out was that that definition (questions with 0 answers) was inconsisten with the other (questions with 0 upvoted answers). Also, the Question counter for both areas are the same. I'll fix that when I get back on my computer. –  Kyle Lacy Aug 27 '12 at 15:39
    
Alright, I've updated the question that addresses the mistake I made. I've fixed the question, so sorry for invalidating your answer :( –  Kyle Lacy Aug 27 '12 at 16:28

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .