What are the sites that allow questions without details and any research?

Question

A few days ago I posted a feature request asking to block questions where the title is equal to the body.

Someone argued that there are SE sites that "do not require research". I think that he means there are sites where it's OK to ask a question that might be written in the title without providing any additional content, so doing anything that helps to trick the automatic checks is fine, like including the title in the body and nothing else.

I'm wondering if nowadays there are sites that have adopted this (questions without "details and any research" are allowed) as an official policy.

I.e., the Welcome modal for new askers instead of saying...

Asking a good question You’re ready to ask your first question and the community is here to help! To get you the best answers, we’ve provided some guidance:

Before you post, search the site to make sure your question hasn’t been answered.

1. Summarize the problem
2. Provide details and any research
3. When appropriate, describe what you’ve tried

You’ll find more tips in the sidebar.

... says something different. I know that the Welcome modal for new askers could be customized, but I think that this is allowed to make it more specific, not to make it more similar to other "forums" (i.e. Quora, Google Products Help Forums, etc.)

By the way, is it possible to get all the Welcome Modal for new askers content from SEDE?

Related

• How should you respond to "Give me a fish" / RTFM questions?

Answer 1

Virtually all Stack Exchange sites require you to do enough research to:

1. Ensure that you're not asking a duplicate question that's already been answered.
2. Clearly describe your question in a way that makes it answerable without back-and-forth.

For some people and some questions, their existing expertise may be enough to do this without having to do any research beyond the duplicate check.

Beyond that, some Stack Exchange sites forbid certain specific classes of "no-research" questions. For example, English Language & Usage and English Language Learners both ban questions that can be answered with a straightforward dictionary lookup (requiring you to explain why your define-this-word question cannot be answered that way).

Other than that, the focus is on the quality and answerability of the question, not the evidence of the asker's research.

To the extent that "effort" and "research" are fairly similar in the context of asking questions, Shog9 describes the types of effort required to ask a good question here, with more thoughts here.

Answer 2

What are the sites that allow questions without details and research?

Yes, most of SE sites. In the answer below, I explain why most of SE sites allow questions without research, which implies that most of SE sites allow questions without details and research.

Someone argued that there are SE sites that "do not require research", I think that he means there are sites where it's OK to ask a question that might be written in the title without providing any additional content, so doing anything that helps to trick the automatic checks is fine, like including the title in the body and nothing else.

This is me. When I said there are SE sites that "do not require [showing] research", by research I mean actual research, which is defined by https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/research as:

careful or diligent search

Most SE don't require the OPs to show research in the body of the question. (i.e., questions that don't show research aren't systematically closed because no research is shown).

If showing research was required, most questions on e.g. webapps or many other SE would be closed. Very few SE enforce showing research as a requirement: medicalsciences is one of the exceptions, and you'll see that most questions get closed there because of that.

Note that:

1. The Welcome modal for new askers says "Provide any research", and not "Provide research".
2. The Welcome modal for new askers says "Asking a good question". It doesn't say that the bullet points are required not to have one's questions closed.
3. The body of the question most always contain details on the question that has nothing to do about research, e.g., a minimal working example, computer configuration, or error message.

Examples of questions with no research being shown, which are perfectly fine and have been well received:

• How do I undo the most recent local commits in Git?
• What is the difference between 'git pull' and 'git fetch'?
• Can comments be used in JSON?
• When should I use \input vs. \include?
• Remove ugly borders around clickable cross-references and hyperlinks
• How to choose the number of hidden layers and nodes in a feedforward neural network?
• What does AUC stand for and what is it?
• Softmax vs Sigmoid function in Logistic classifier?

The OP commented to ask for more recent questions, so here are some posted over the past 3 months:

• Can we calculate mean of absolute value of a random variable analytically?
• Can I (a US citizen) travel from Puerto Rico to Miami with just a copy of my passport?
• When an individual enters the United States, can they have an attorney present when going through the U.S. Customs and Border Protection?

---

To conclude, keep in mind that the above answer pertains to showing research. The fact that showing research is not required doesn't mean that the OP shouldn't try to search for the answer. See What level of initial research is expected on questions? and this nice flowchart by Borror0:

Answer 3

After some days that I posted this question I think that using "allow" in the question was misfortunate. I will not edit it because there are already two answers but I want to share that now I think that questions without any detail and any research are allowed but might be downvoted, closed or kept open, those that aren't allowed are blocked by the automatic quality filter or deleted by humans.

Anyway I think that it is interesting how the communities are working to build a shared understating of the appropriate use of the SE privileges (upvote, downvote, vote to close, etc.).

---

Using an alternate account I have reviewed some SE sites, so far from 3 (3D Printing) to C. All of them have the Asking a good question pop-up, so far, I think that it's fair to say that there isn't any site that allow questions without any details and any research.

Also I looked at some per-site Metas, sometimes by following a link, other times by googling and other by going directly o a per-site Meta. Here are some of what I think are interesting findings related to this question:

• Physics. They have the tag insufficient-effort. So far this tag has 5 questions, no tag excerpt, not tag wiki. Remarcable question: What does everyone mean by “insufficient research effort”? from 2016

• Mathematics. They have the tag context, tag excerpt "For question related to missing context close reason". Remarcable questions: How to ask a good question, How much research is considered as sufficient prior research before asking a question?

• Ask Ubuntu. They have the tag question-quality. It hasn't a tag excerpt. Remarcable questions: How much research effort is expected of Ask Ubuntu users?, What is the proper reaction to a post which clearly lacks research?

• Super User. Remarcable questions: Close question for no reseach effort

• Tex. They have the tag please-do-this-for-me, tag excerpt "A solution is requested for a problem that shows no evidence of prior effort". Remarcable questions: Etiquette for poorly researched questions?, Reasons for closing questions: too little effort

• Statistics. Remarcable questions Is it reasonable to downvote a fair fraction of one user's posts for lack of research?

• Electrical Engineering. Remarcable questions: Question closed with “Insufficient preliminary research” cause, What's happened to value in research effort?, What qualifies as “research effort”?

• Mathemathica & Wolfram Language Remarcable questions: Handling blatant RTFM cases---harmful to the community?, The advisability of answering interesting questions for less-than-helpful users

• Blender Remarcable questions : What is our criteria for a minimum effort?