Timeline for A +30 question closed as not constructive although there is much agreement it should be kept open?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 2011 at 16:50 | comment | added | Iterator | @Lasse, thanks for the info. I think we're all learning that there can be good advice given to questioners for tag user populations that are not as familiar with customs that have evolved elsewhere on SO or far enough back in SO history. | |
| Aug 2, 2011 at 15:42 | comment | added | Iterator | Here's some food for thought. Joel Spolsky has some thoughts on canonical answers for Stack Overflow and how to work collaboratively to produce better answers and questions. blog.stackoverflow.com/2011/01/… | |
| Aug 2, 2011 at 15:08 | comment | added | whuber | +1 for the distinction between "mentors and guides" and "functionaries." | |
| Aug 2, 2011 at 15:06 | comment | added | Lasse V. Karlsen Mod | There was a comment by a moderator quite early on that it was a poll question likely to be closed as non constructive. 9 Hours later, the question was still in its bad form, and thus closed, due to flags and a moderator reacting to those flags. | |
| Aug 2, 2011 at 15:02 | history | edited | Iterator | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 characters in body
|
| Aug 2, 2011 at 13:58 | history | answered | Iterator | CC BY-SA 3.0 |