Timeline for Is there a policy on dangerous answers?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2011 at 14:06 | comment | added | Stephen | An application built by a single programmer would still be better than what is being discussed here - this is a TESTER who wants to try his hand at writing code rather than use an existing SQL Client. | |
| Aug 18, 2011 at 8:56 | history | edited | Lightness Races in Orbit | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1391 characters in body
|
| Aug 17, 2011 at 13:00 | comment | added | Lightness Races in Orbit | @Wesley: As I said, it was ironically exaggerated in some respects. I like alliteration. | |
| Aug 17, 2011 at 12:50 | comment | added | Lightness Races in Orbit | @Wesley: It's an ironically exaggerated response to the fact that the community is not content to write a warning and/or refuse to answer when a "dangerous" question is posted; ten or twenty identical "don't do this" "why are you doing this" "what is wrong with you" comments must be posted instead. It ultimately becomes noise and, I think, detracts from the message that it's all trying to convey. | |
| Aug 17, 2011 at 12:34 | comment | added | user159834 | What exactly is "utterly useless repetitive drivel" supposed to be referring to? | |
| Aug 17, 2011 at 4:58 | comment | added | J0HN | +1 for PhpMyadmin example :) | |
| Aug 16, 2011 at 17:32 | history | answered | Lightness Races in Orbit | CC BY-SA 3.0 |