Timeline for Should I as an OP just go with moderators' decision if my question is closed but I (and some moderators) are not convinced with their reason?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:31 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 13:59 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
|
| Aug 17, 2011 at 12:26 | comment | added | Bill the Lizard Mod | I definitely agree, getting feedback from the community is always welcome. I only locked that particular post because the OP was arguing that it was good enough as-is, instead of editing to improve it. | |
| Aug 17, 2011 at 12:00 | history | edited | Lasse V. KarlsenMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added point brought up by cody
|
| Aug 17, 2011 at 11:58 | comment | added | Lasse V. Karlsen Mod | Oh, I agree, the exact way to handle it depends on the situation. My point was that if all evidence points to the moderator being wrong, then getting a second opinion, through either flagging or meta, is entirely possible. | |
| Aug 17, 2011 at 11:56 | comment | added | Cody Gray | While you certainly can flag the post again, I think bringing the issue to Meta is perfectly acceptable once an action has been taken by a moderator. That gives you a little more space to justify your opinions than the flag dialog and it lets the general community air their opinions as well. | |
| Aug 17, 2011 at 11:38 | history | answered | Lasse V. KarlsenMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |