Timeline for How do you want to be notified of unaccepted answers?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
19 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2017 at 12:36 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
|
|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:31 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 13:45 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Fixup of bad MSO links to MSE links migration
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 9:28 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
|
| Sep 25, 2011 at 15:55 | comment | added | msh210 | I don't understand why you're counting that you'd get 201 notifications rather than 520. Surely the software won't wait around to see whether the answer will be re-accepted before notifying you. Or if it will, how long shall it wait? (I'm assuming the inbox-notification method, or similar.) | |
| Sep 22, 2011 at 13:47 | comment | added | Grace Note StaffMod | This notifies you of the removal of acceptance but it doesn't appear to leave the original acceptance, so it leads to weird results. | |
| Sep 22, 2011 at 2:24 | history | edited | Nick CraverMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Sep 22, 2011 at 2:23 | vote | accept | Nick Craver | ||
| Sep 7, 2011 at 22:59 | answer | added | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | timeline score: 4 | |
| Sep 7, 2011 at 10:49 | comment | added | VonC | What about the answers points and upvotes that vanish when a user is deleted? | |
| Sep 7, 2011 at 6:46 | answer | added | Lance Roberts | timeline score: 2 | |
| Sep 7, 2011 at 4:24 | comment | added | NullUserException อ_อ | While you are at it, can we also get notified of rep lost for delete posts? | |
| Sep 7, 2011 at 1:45 | answer | added | user154510 | timeline score: 12 | |
| Sep 7, 2011 at 1:45 | comment | added | Kevin Montrose | @Tim - IMO the down vote parallel is the correct one (putting them on the reputation tab, that is). It's almost an accident that they aren't show that way now, just an implementation detail really. | |
| Sep 7, 2011 at 1:45 | answer | added | Rick Sladkey | timeline score: 49 | |
| Sep 7, 2011 at 1:36 | comment | added | Tim Stone | I don't see any reason to make it behave any differently than downvotes, personally, but I haven't thought about it enough to back that up with any sort of justification. | |
| Sep 7, 2011 at 1:23 | history | edited | Nick CraverMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Sep 7, 2011 at 1:15 | history | edited | waffles | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
link
|
| Sep 7, 2011 at 1:13 | history | asked | Nick CraverMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |