Skip to main content
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
Source Link

Your answer to this questionthis question was accepted on 21 August, but unaccepted again 9 seconds lateraccepted on 21 August, but unaccepted again 9 seconds later. (It was accepted yet again a day later.) I guess this is the reason for the 0 rep showing up for 21 August on your reputation report. Of course it would make more sense if the whole thing just wouldn't show up if there's no link you can follow. And judging by Nick Craver's comment of 22 September here, I'd say this is a bug.

Your answer to this question was accepted on 21 August, but unaccepted again 9 seconds later. (It was accepted yet again a day later.) I guess this is the reason for the 0 rep showing up for 21 August on your reputation report. Of course it would make more sense if the whole thing just wouldn't show up if there's no link you can follow. And judging by Nick Craver's comment of 22 September here, I'd say this is a bug.

Your answer to this question was accepted on 21 August, but unaccepted again 9 seconds later. (It was accepted yet again a day later.) I guess this is the reason for the 0 rep showing up for 21 August on your reputation report. Of course it would make more sense if the whole thing just wouldn't show up if there's no link you can follow. And judging by Nick Craver's comment of 22 September here, I'd say this is a bug.

replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

Your answer to this question was accepted on 21 August, but unaccepted again 9 seconds later. (It was accepted yet again a day later.) I guess this is the reason for the 0 rep showing up for 21 August on your reputation report. Of course it would make more sense if the whole thing just wouldn't show up if there's no link you can follow. And judging by Nick Craver's comment of 22 September hereNick Craver's comment of 22 September here, I'd say this is a bug.

Your answer to this question was accepted on 21 August, but unaccepted again 9 seconds later. (It was accepted yet again a day later.) I guess this is the reason for the 0 rep showing up for 21 August on your reputation report. Of course it would make more sense if the whole thing just wouldn't show up if there's no link you can follow. And judging by Nick Craver's comment of 22 September here, I'd say this is a bug.

Your answer to this question was accepted on 21 August, but unaccepted again 9 seconds later. (It was accepted yet again a day later.) I guess this is the reason for the 0 rep showing up for 21 August on your reputation report. Of course it would make more sense if the whole thing just wouldn't show up if there's no link you can follow. And judging by Nick Craver's comment of 22 September here, I'd say this is a bug.

Fixup of bad MSO links to MSE links migration
Source Link

Your answer to this question was accepted on 21 August21 August, but unaccepted again 9 seconds later. (It was accepted yet again a day later.) I guess this is the reason for the 0 rep showing up for 21 August21 August on your reputation report. Of course it would make more sense if the whole thing just wouldn't show up if there's no link you can follow. And judging by Nick Craver's comment of 22 September22 September here, I'd say this is a bug.

Your answer to this question was accepted on 21 August, but unaccepted again 9 seconds later. (It was accepted yet again a day later.) I guess this is the reason for the 0 rep showing up for 21 August on your reputation report. Of course it would make more sense if the whole thing just wouldn't show up if there's no link you can follow. And judging by Nick Craver's comment of 22 September here, I'd say this is a bug.

Your answer to this question was accepted on 21 August, but unaccepted again 9 seconds later. (It was accepted yet again a day later.) I guess this is the reason for the 0 rep showing up for 21 August on your reputation report. Of course it would make more sense if the whole thing just wouldn't show up if there's no link you can follow. And judging by Nick Craver's comment of 22 September here, I'd say this is a bug.

Migration of MSO links to MSE links
Source Link
Loading
link to implementation how unaccepts should be shown in the reputation report
Source Link
Hendrik Vogt
  • 6.1k
  • 1
  • 32
  • 46
Loading
Source Link
Hendrik Vogt
  • 6.1k
  • 1
  • 32
  • 46
Loading