Timeline for Proposed improvement to flagging, for answers
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2011 at 5:56 | comment | added | Chris Frederick | You could also arguably classify a post like that as Conversational and irrelevant. | |
| Oct 27, 2011 at 5:18 | comment | added | Adam Lear StaffMod | That's more of a "not an answer" (should've been, at best, a comment) than "very low quality". The latter should be used for unreadable posts, even though pretty much nobody ever uses it that way.. which is in itself an argument for removing it at least from answers. | |
| Oct 27, 2011 at 3:32 | history | edited | Lance Roberts | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 75 characters in body
|
| Oct 27, 2011 at 2:39 | history | edited | Lance Roberts | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 100 characters in body
|
| Oct 27, 2011 at 2:25 | history | answered | Lance Roberts | CC BY-SA 3.0 |