Timeline for How to prevent users applying a policy without agreement?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2011 at 23:04 | comment | added | Rob Moir | It might have been done in good faith, but I'd suggest that someone who really thinks that editing the "damn" out of "damn small linux" is a good idea. then they are a poster child for why editing is a privilege, not a right. If someone has a pattern of that then this should be addressed. | |
| Oct 31, 2011 at 20:34 | comment | added | Pops |
@Pekka, it's where $reader_name_here says it is, obviously.
|
|
| Oct 31, 2011 at 17:22 | history | edited | Pekka | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 12 characters in body
|
| Oct 31, 2011 at 17:15 | comment | added | Pekka | @Diago yeah, there absolutely is value in raising the point. This was an edge case because it touches a grey area - where is the line where censor-worthy profanity begins? | |
| Oct 31, 2011 at 17:13 | comment | added | BinaryMisfit | +1 Valid point and they could very well be in good faith. Not warranting anything to change or prevent it is acceptable, however, I do believe there is value in raising the point on meta. | |
| Oct 31, 2011 at 17:10 | history | answered | Pekka | CC BY-SA 3.0 |