Timeline for Handling answers that build heavily on (or are copied outright from) existing answers
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:30 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 13:59 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
|
| Nov 14, 2011 at 16:40 | comment | added | Kev Mod | @casperOne - think of it as an enthusiastic "fork" of your answer :) | |
| Nov 14, 2011 at 16:21 | comment | added | casperOne | In regards to your specific points, length - I'm generally descriptive, I like for people to have everything that I've thought of and my perceptions leaning one way or another before I post. Tone - that's subjective and as stated, I welcome edits to change that. This isn't the first time this has happened to people on SO, but I've not been able to find a question on meta regarding this situation (where there is attribution), so I wanted to get it out there. | |
| Nov 14, 2011 at 16:17 | comment | added | casperOne | If that's the way it came off, I apologize, but I tried to keep it as objective as possible (but was transparent about it happening to me, otherwise, I'd be called out on that). If there's an edit that can reduce the perceived tone, then I encourage it. | |
| Nov 14, 2011 at 16:14 | comment | added | Kev Mod | @casperOne The length of your post and and its general tone suggested differently. Otherwise why would you post such a question? | |
| Nov 14, 2011 at 16:11 | comment | added | casperOne | You're making the assumption that someone was offended? That was not stated in the question. | |
| Nov 14, 2011 at 16:06 | history | answered | KevMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |