Timeline for URLs wrapped in <> are not parsing correctly in comments
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 9:43 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackoverflow.com/ with https://meta.stackoverflow.com/
|
|
| Nov 14, 2011 at 21:51 | comment | added | Schwern | By your first statement, I believe my question wasn't clear. It's not that SO should insert angle brackets when displaying URLs, but that SO should turn URLs with brackets around them into links. This is about autolinking, not display. Otherwise, see my comment to @kiamlaluno's answer, summed up as A) there's no docs saying comments autolink different from posts, yet they do autolink and more importantly B) different autolink behaviors are confusing, why do it? | |
| Nov 14, 2011 at 20:03 | comment | added | Kevin Vermeer | And here's an example of just linking to the page: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inotify. Can you tell that's a link? | |
| Nov 14, 2011 at 20:03 | comment | added | Kevin Vermeer |
Here's an example of a better link to that page: Wikipedia article on inotify, produced by [Wikipedia article on inotify](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inotify).
|
|
| Nov 14, 2011 at 20:02 | comment | added | Kevin Vermeer |
Here is an example of not parsing differently, if you really want your angle brackets: <en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inotify> produced by [<en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inotify>](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inotify).
|
|
| Nov 14, 2011 at 20:02 | history | edited | Kevin Vermeer | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 710 characters in body
|
| Nov 14, 2011 at 19:59 | history | undeleted | Kevin Vermeer | ||
| Nov 14, 2011 at 19:55 | history | deleted | Kevin Vermeer | ||
| Nov 14, 2011 at 19:53 | history | answered | Kevin Vermeer | CC BY-SA 3.0 |