Adam Davis http://www.gravatar.com/avatar/51301603f62b97a6fecdeeb3a5d41eca?s=16&d=identicon&r=PG Adam Davis asked: Have you ever voted to close a post you knew you could edit if you had more time?
genesis http://www.gravatar.com/avatar/f77ef279d6b33bc09ce5422049dd9e37?s=16&d=identicon&r=PG genesis answered: No. That's a wrong step. If I do not have time, I let it as-is. It might be edited by someone else.
casperOne http://www.gravatar.com/avatar/1b2b5d5007262ea3f9e21ab5b15f8b75?s=16&d=identicon&r=PG casperOne answered: No, but at the same time, "more time" is subjective. If I think I can improve a post, I usually favorite it and come back if I don't feel I have "enough time".
Brad Larson http://www.gravatar.com/avatar/52a2ffb44b1c11ab9001cb67e0a0021c?s=16&d=identicon&r=PG Brad Larson answered: I've voted to close questions, then realized how I could edit them into shape afterwards. I then would generally edit the question and leave behind a comment telling people to ignore my mistaken close vote.
Stu Thompson http://www.gravatar.com/avatar/428344688dc21d72a3723d94bed66680?s=16&d=identicon&r=PG Stu Thompson answered: No, I've never closed that could be saved by editing. I, somewhat masochistically, like to cleanup newbie posts. If it is beyond my capabilities (eg.: don't know language x well enough to format the code to a presentable state) or time then I'll leave it.
BoltClock http://www.gravatar.com/avatar/b18f87cf0e7706ab763c2f90e27a55de?s=16&d=identicon&r=PG BoltClock answered: Yes, and in that case my close vote is often intended as a chance for the OP to do so.
awoodland http://www.gravatar.com/avatar/b580e2e87bbf41c6ef179df41184288d?s=16&d=identicon&r=PG awoodland answered: I don't think so on that one - edits that save a question are more far more rewarding than simply closing in my view.