Timeline for How do I alert admins about potential vengeful behavior?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2017 at 12:35 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
|
|
| Feb 9, 2012 at 11:33 | comment | added | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | @AaronBertrand If a single user downvoted (or upvoted) many of your posts in a short time, the votes are automatically removed. It's a daily batch job, so check again after 24 hours. If you really have had many downvotes (“four or five” is not many), have you checked that they're still there? You give the impression of complaining about something which is not a big deal in the first place and may not even be real. | |
| Feb 9, 2012 at 7:03 | comment | added | user159834 | I don't know which point of your comment to address first... If you believe this is a serious issue, you can send in a flag or email the team directly - you probably know that by now. The anonymous downvote "problem" has been discussed to no end, but I didn't mean to imply that it cannot be discussed further, nor did I mean to imply that the design of life or SO is perfect. I can only say that your prevailing negative attitude towards others about this subject is turning me off to this community. I'm really feeling some acid in your tone. | |
| Feb 9, 2012 at 6:57 | comment | added | Aaron Bertrand Staff | I also think your math is suspect, unless you don't see the same reputation history that I do. Again, not that I'm counting points, just that there was a sudden burst of down-votes that I deemed suspect. | |
| Feb 9, 2012 at 6:55 | comment | added | Aaron Bertrand Staff | You've convinced me. I'm going to start down-voting arbitrarily and anonymously. Screw courtesy. This wasn't about a pity party, this was about letting the admins know there is behavior on the site that is pushing away and turning off valuable contributors. But I guess we shouldn't talk about it because it's been talked about before, and because the current design is what is intended, it must be the perfect design. | |
| Feb 9, 2012 at 6:42 | history | answered | user159834 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |