Timeline for Deleted posts should not influence reputation
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2012 at 19:53 | comment | added | Pekka |
In fact, I worry about my sweet repz now, knowing that they are being stored in coarse ints. Who knows what kind of scratches and dents they could get in there. I demand better storage!
|
|
| Mar 6, 2012 at 19:50 | comment | added | Pekka |
@Nick decimal? That's loser talk. float or death!
|
|
| Mar 6, 2012 at 18:44 | comment | added | Patrick Karcher | @Nick Craver. You mean for the Question? Yes, obviously, 2.5 would not be good! Some integer of course, probably 2 for Questions, 4 or 5 for Answers. | |
| Mar 6, 2012 at 18:43 | comment | added | Patrick Karcher | @ChrisF I didn't like the 3+ score | 60+ day rule, actually, for the same reasons as Gilles. Seems very arbitrary. | |
| Mar 6, 2012 at 16:52 | comment | added | Nick Craver Mod |
I just finished rewriting most of the reputation code to be sane, now you want me to make it a decimal instead on an int? Must resist urge to hunt users with salad fork...
|
|
| Mar 6, 2012 at 16:37 | comment | added | ChrisF Mod | Hmm - interesting idea to keep half the rep from deleted posts - presumably the 3+ score, 60+ day rule would still apply to this? | |
| Mar 6, 2012 at 16:33 | history | edited | Patrick Karcher | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1951 characters in body
|
| Mar 6, 2012 at 16:25 | history | edited | Patrick Karcher | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1951 characters in body
|
| Mar 6, 2012 at 16:10 | history | answered | Patrick Karcher | CC BY-SA 3.0 |