Skip to main content
24 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 20, 2017 at 10:30 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
Mar 16, 2017 at 15:44 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://meta.english.stackexchange.com/ with https://english.meta.stackexchange.com/
Nov 28, 2016 at 21:18 history edited tshepang CC BY-SA 3.0
trim the fat
Apr 23, 2014 at 13:59 history edited CommunityBot
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
Jun 8, 2012 at 3:13 history notice removed jmort253
Jun 8, 2012 at 3:13 history bounty ended jmort253
Jun 1, 2012 at 11:00 answer added Cjxcz Odjcayrwl timeline score: -1
Jun 1, 2012 at 5:04 answer added Shog9Mod timeline score: 20
Jun 1, 2012 at 4:27 history edited jmort253 CC BY-SA 3.0
added edit to go along with bounty
Jun 1, 2012 at 4:20 history notice added jmort253 Authoritative reference needed
Jun 1, 2012 at 4:20 history bounty started jmort253
May 31, 2012 at 11:02 history edited yannis
edited tags
Mar 16, 2012 at 3:16 comment added Daniel @BrockAdams (+1) Related: Can we allow 7.5K users to suggest tag synonyms without a score of 5 in the tag? to which I've just added a measly bounty (just to bump it). Also Could mods catalyze synonym voting?
Mar 16, 2012 at 0:54 history edited Rebecca ChernoffMod
edited tags
Mar 16, 2012 at 0:09 answer added Rebecca ChernoffMod timeline score: 23
Mar 15, 2012 at 23:58 comment added FumbleFingers @Kevin Vermeer: If there are 20,000 questions with that tag then fairly obviously a lot of people thought it was a good tag! If it was in fact always a bad tag that's simply evidence that the particular site has been badly managed for a long time. I am talking about useless tags like [word] on ELU, which normally has no associated questions. If they do turn up again, we assiduously remove that tag, but we can't stop it from turning up again. Your attitude doesn't seem particularly constructive, frankly.
Mar 15, 2012 at 23:54 history edited FumbleFingers CC BY-SA 3.0
clarify scope of request
Mar 15, 2012 at 23:48 comment added Kevin Vermeer @FumbleFingers - How do you make sure that there are no no current questions that use the tag when there are 2,000 questions with that tag? By editing manually? What a waste of time!
Mar 15, 2012 at 23:40 comment added FumbleFingers @Kevin Vermeer: I didn't know the term 'burninate' until I came over here to ask my question, when I first of all searched to see what else had been raised. It's a useful concept, but in terms of "bangs per buck" I think it's probably not in the same league. Arguably, if a tag has more than a handful of associated questions, it shouldn't be made too easy to make mass changes. I'm only talking about cases where the mod(s) will have already ensured that no current questions use the tag, so thanks for raising the point because I'll edit to reflect that.
Mar 15, 2012 at 23:21 comment added Kevin Vermeer You might want to consider adding the 'burninate' (delete all instances of a tag) action to this request. It's required to add a tag to a blacklist, and I don't think burnination should require blacklisting.
Mar 15, 2012 at 22:56 comment added FumbleFingers @Brock Adams: Yeah - we had a problem on ELU a few days back where a couple of tags trivially needed to be synonymised, but not enough people had enough relevant rep to vote through the change, because they hadn't earned the rep on questions with those specific tags. But figuring out changes to improve all that might be hard work. All I'm asking is that the devs keep each site's "blacklisted" tags in a table that mods can add to (unilaterally, by unanimous/majority vote, I don't care). They don't need to be able to "unblacklist" without involving devs, or anything else complicated.
Mar 15, 2012 at 22:39 comment added Awesome Poodles Yes. The methods for synonymizing, and disambiguating tags need revamping too. The current system is not working.
Mar 15, 2012 at 22:13 history edited ChrisFMod
edited tags
Mar 15, 2012 at 22:11 history asked FumbleFingers CC BY-SA 3.0