Timeline for What happened to "attribution required"?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2009 at 17:29 | comment | added | chaos | Further material on this here: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/13976/… | |
| Aug 5, 2009 at 18:42 | comment | added | chaos |
Point 1 is certainly citation-required. Is there some terms of service document I agreed to where I turned copyright to my words over to Jeff? I can find no evidence of it. It's actually all quite vague, but near as I can tell, the implication of posting something on S[OFU] is that you're agreeing to license it under cc-attribution-sharealike and that S[OFU] is using it under those terms.
|
|
| Aug 5, 2009 at 18:18 | comment | added | Hilarious Comedy Pesto | Let me take your answer point by point. Point #1: I don't think this is accurate (it's all CC-Wiki and requires attribution). Point #2: That's really not a good excuse. Otherwise I'm reposting everything from SO, 140 characters at a time. Point #3: It's 100% original to me in the sense that I didn't swipe it from anywhere (see my comment on Brian Knoblauch's post), but I don't claim to be the only one to have ever conceived of it. | |
| Aug 5, 2009 at 18:03 | comment | added | GEOCHET | google.com/search?q=subclass+of+girlfriend | |
| Aug 5, 2009 at 17:58 | history | answered | Joel CoehoornMod | CC BY-SA 2.5 |