Timeline for New Badge: Quick-Draw
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
26 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2023 at 17:42 | comment | added | mathlander | 3 minutes is shorter than the grace period for editing, so if the last revision was within the quick-draw time, only it would be shown. | |
| Aug 12, 2010 at 11:48 | answer | added | Andrew Grimm | timeline score: 1 | |
| Apr 26, 2010 at 15:55 | history | edited | Jon Seigel |
edited tags
|
|
| Jul 13, 2009 at 17:28 | history | edited | Jeff Atwood |
edited tags
|
|
| Jun 30, 2009 at 20:41 | comment | added | TheTXI | mmyers: I don't think that the timeframe of the acceptance (or how long it took for the votes) should matter as long as the answer itself remained within the allowable window. That would mean that as long as your post was in there fast and didn't get revised OUT of the allowable window, it would get the badge either A) during the time it is accepted if it already has the appropriate number of votes or B) when it gets the final necessary vote if it has already been accepted. | |
| Jun 30, 2009 at 20:23 | history | edited | Sampson | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 197 characters in body; added 232 characters in body; added 5 characters in body
|
| Jun 30, 2009 at 20:22 | comment | added | mmyers | @TheTXI: How would that fit in with awarding the badge at some point down the road when the answer finally gets accepted? Does that count or not? What if it was only accepted because of the edits? There are all sorts of edge cases here. | |
| Jun 30, 2009 at 20:09 | comment | added | devinb | @TXI, I missed the criteria of 'accepted' I thought it only had to be upvoted. I am thoroughly shamed. | |
| Jun 30, 2009 at 20:03 | comment | added | TheTXI | mmyers: I would say that once the badge is awarded it's awarded (just like all badges). If you win the badge and THEN revise the answer, I don't see a problem with that. | |
| Jun 30, 2009 at 19:59 | comment | added | mmyers | So if you revise the answer a day later, you lose the badge? I don't think we want to discourage editing here. I think basing it on the timing of the votes is enough for this. | |
| Jun 30, 2009 at 19:56 | comment | added | Sampson | You're right. +10 votes and accepted seems to be pretty solid. | |
| Jun 30, 2009 at 19:56 | history | edited | Sampson | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 1 characters in body; deleted 259 characters in body
|
| Jun 30, 2009 at 19:55 | comment | added | TheTXI | I would say that if you wanted this to be a gold-version of the enlightened badge, you should require a greater score than just +5. +10 or +25 are more in line with gold standards on SO. | |
| Jun 30, 2009 at 19:46 | comment | added | Sampson | Base the award on # of revisions too. | |
| Jun 30, 2009 at 19:46 | history | edited | Sampson | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 108 characters in body; added 23 characters in body; deleted 18 characters in body; added 106 characters in body
|
| Jun 30, 2009 at 19:42 | comment | added | TheTXI | devinb: Joke or pithy answers don't tend to get accepted as often as an actually useful answer. I would also say discount CW posts because they tend to have a higher tendency of those types of quick posts (I am guilty of them often myself). | |
| Jun 30, 2009 at 19:42 | answer | added | Jon Skeet | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jun 30, 2009 at 19:41 | comment | added | TheTXI | I think you should also revise this suggestion to also include a more restrictive timeframe (or no timeframe allowance at all) for answer revision. That would immediately prevent people from posting first and then crafting a better response to get the badge. | |
| Jun 30, 2009 at 19:40 | comment | added | devinb | You'll get a lot of people earning this badge for 'joke' or 'pithy' answers. They are usually first, and they get a lot of upvotes. | |
| Jun 30, 2009 at 19:37 | comment | added | TheTXI | I like this. I do see it as an upgraded Enlightened badge. | |
| Jun 30, 2009 at 19:31 | history | edited | Sampson | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 113 characters in body; edited body
|
| Jun 30, 2009 at 19:28 | answer | added | Timothy Carter | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jun 30, 2009 at 19:28 | answer | added | Kyle CroninMod | timeline score: 10 | |
| Jun 30, 2009 at 19:27 | answer | added | mmyers | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jun 30, 2009 at 19:27 | answer | added | Assaf Lavie | timeline score: 25 | |
| Jun 30, 2009 at 19:26 | history | asked | Sampson | CC BY-SA 2.5 |