Timeline for Allow people to answer protected questions if they have earned at least some amount of combined SE rep
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 18, 2021 at 11:45 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://blog.stackoverflow.com with https://blog.stackoverflow.com
|
|
Mar 20, 2017 at 10:30 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
May 29, 2016 at 12:21 | comment | added | Michael Freidgeim | The banner on protected questions is misleading. Please vote to improve it Make reputation message when answering protected questions less ambiguous | |
Apr 24, 2014 at 13:34 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
|
Apr 14, 2012 at 18:08 | comment | added | Pops | Interesting, I hardly ever run into protected questions in the wild. | |
Apr 14, 2012 at 18:00 | comment | added | Jeff Atwood | @ben reminder that questions are automatically switched to protected when three new user answers are deleted by a moderator on that question | |
Apr 13, 2012 at 21:41 | comment | added | Lorem Ipsum | Nice, I did not know about this change. I would also strongly encourage the same for the downvote privilege — earn 125 rep on that site in order to be able to downvote. Requiring just 25 points (current system) is easy peasy. | |
Apr 13, 2012 at 21:20 | comment | added | Shog9 Mod | Yeah, by all means flag the post if you don't see an obvious reason; I've seen quite a few where it's misapplied. On the rare occasions where I've used it myself, it's been on posts that are collecting a lot of spam or noise, or extremely popular questions that are collecting duplicate answers from new users unwilling to read what's already been posted. It helps a good deal in those cases, but they are quite rare. | |
Apr 13, 2012 at 21:14 | comment | added | Ben Lee | Thanks for your very complete answer. I actually think that's actually exactly the problem I encountered -- a question was protected for no reason apparent to me (of course, it's possible it had previously gotten a lot of drive-by answers that have been deleted that I can't see, or a high-rep user more familiar with the site had reason to suspect it would, but maybe it was just incidentally over-protected). | |
Apr 13, 2012 at 21:07 | vote | accept | Ben Lee | ||
Apr 13, 2012 at 20:54 | history | answered | Shog9Mod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |