Timeline for Markdown syntax for `<kbd>foo</kbd>`
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
25 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:45 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://apple.stackexchange.com/ with https://apple.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:30 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Nov 28, 2015 at 13:06 | answer | added | pyrocrasty | timeline score: 1 | |
| Apr 23, 2014 at 14:05 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
|
| Apr 24, 2012 at 5:50 | comment | added | Arjan |
And, to extend on @Marc's comment about breaking current posts: it also makes it more difficult for other users of the data to parse it. (That aside, I dislike <kbd> a lot. Apple itself is not using it either on their site! And I even feel we're using it incorrectly at these sites, especially since these sites started using HTML5.)
|
|
| Apr 24, 2012 at 5:42 | answer | added | Awesome Poodles | timeline score: 17 | |
| Apr 23, 2012 at 11:12 | comment | added | jtbandes | possible duplicate/related to meta.stackexchange.com/questions/102841/… | |
| Apr 23, 2012 at 10:52 | comment | added | Marc Gravell |
@MathiasBynens how about the one in your question? all of a sudden, the meaning has changed... (ok, in reality we wouldn't apply inside ` sections)
|
|
| Apr 23, 2012 at 10:44 | comment | added | Mathias Bynens |
@MarcGravell What would be an acceptable example of using ~Foo~ in text (not code!) where removing the ~ would “break” it, i.e. make it unreadable?
|
|
| Apr 23, 2012 at 10:01 | comment | added | Manishearth | @mathias. What Marc said. I'm open to writing a userscript for you guys, though it may take a while. | |
| Apr 23, 2012 at 9:55 | comment | added | Marc Gravell | Technically, any addition to markdown is a breaking change - after all, anyone could have used ~Foo~ at any point. Is this really common enough to need markdown changes? As a side note, editor changes (i.e. some keypress like the existing Ctrl+B for bold etc) might be less contentious... | |
| Apr 23, 2012 at 9:55 | comment | added | Mathias Bynens | @Manishearth How can anyone “disagree” with a feature request like this? If you don’t need it, it won’t bother you either — just don’t use it then. | |
| Apr 23, 2012 at 9:52 | comment | added | Manishearth | @MathiasBynens Voting is different on meta | |
| Apr 23, 2012 at 9:46 | comment | added | Mathias Bynens | Why the downvote? | |
| Apr 23, 2012 at 9:45 | history | edited | Mathias Bynens | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 7 characters in body
|
| Apr 23, 2012 at 9:39 | history | edited | Mathias Bynens | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 260 characters in body
|
| Apr 23, 2012 at 9:30 | comment | added | Awesome Poodles | @HenkHolterman, <kbd> never did work in comments. They've deliberately kept most markup out of those. | |
| Apr 23, 2012 at 9:28 | comment | added | Awesome Poodles | @MathiasBynens, you can use script to give keyboard shortcuts to things, too (or even implement your own mark-up interpreter). | |
| Apr 23, 2012 at 9:27 | comment | added | Henk Holterman | @BrockAdams - not in comments (anymore?) | |
| Apr 23, 2012 at 9:27 | comment | added | Mathias Bynens | @Manishearth A Markdown syntax would be much faster. I’m a keyboard user; I don’t like pressing buttons. | |
| Apr 23, 2012 at 9:26 | comment | added | Manishearth | Why not give yourself a button that does it? Shouldn't be hard to script... | |
| Apr 23, 2012 at 9:25 | comment | added | Awesome Poodles | @HenkHolterman, it still works. He just doesn't want to have to type it all out. | |
| Apr 23, 2012 at 9:24 | comment | added | Henk Holterman |
The <kbd> tag used to work, didn't it? Like <kbd>F1</kbd>
|
|
| Apr 23, 2012 at 9:24 | comment | added | Awesome Poodles |
Can't use a double back-tick; It would totally break displaying a code-formatted slash (\).
|
|
| Apr 23, 2012 at 9:10 | history | asked | Mathias Bynens | CC BY-SA 3.0 |