Timeline for Change the "Not Constructive" close reason to some variation of "not a good fit for SE" so it matches its description?

9 events

when toggle format	what		by	license	comment
Mar 20, 2017 at 10:31	history	edited	CommunityBot		replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
Apr 24, 2014 at 13:34	history	edited	CommunityBot		Migration of MSO links to MSE links
Apr 26, 2012 at 17:57	history	edited	user102937	CC BY-SA 3.0	added 6 characters in body
Apr 24, 2012 at 20:03	history	edited	user102937	CC BY-SA 3.0	edited body
Apr 24, 2012 at 18:49	history	edited	user102937	CC BY-SA 3.0	added 343 characters in body
Apr 24, 2012 at 18:38	comment	added	user102937		To put it another way, if they can't get their mind around "Not Constructive," they probably don't qualify to ask a question on SE.
Apr 24, 2012 at 18:30	comment	added	user102937		And also very necessary. There's a certain minimum amount of effort we require new users to make to understand the community; those who insist on asking bikeshed questions don't make that effort, don't care about the community, and are indifferent to the wording of the close reasons. They only care about their own agenda, whatever that is. In short, they're selfish.
Apr 24, 2012 at 18:08	comment	added	Rachel		I think your definition shows why it's so confusing. Closing questions that help a user improve themselves or their situation as `not-constructive` just because it doesn't meet the SE guidelines for good questions is very confusing.
Apr 24, 2012 at 16:29	history	answered	user102937	CC BY-SA 3.0