Timeline for How can I generate unread items in my inbox for testing?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
32 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2012 at 18:08 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jul 14, 2012 at 12:47 | |||||
| May 22, 2012 at 14:22 | comment | added | Pops | Yeah, I only commented to get that into the "Linked" section. I didn't say anything else because I didn't think you, specifically, needed to be told. Sorry if it came off that way. | |
| May 22, 2012 at 14:16 | comment | added | jumbo | @PopularDemand I already read this, but thanks anyway. The link should be mentioned here. | |
| May 22, 2012 at 14:12 | comment | added | Pops | I am a sockpuppet, may I exist if I have a real purpose? | |
| May 21, 2012 at 19:42 | comment | added | Arjan | There's even notification notifications nowadays :-) | |
| May 21, 2012 at 19:38 | comment | added | jumbo | @Arjan I am not dealing with Unicode in any way. I am reading only total count of new messages for my notifications ;) | |
| May 21, 2012 at 19:34 | comment | added | jumbo | @Arjan I think Scope parameter of authorization process is what are you asking about - here it is in docs. For example this is url requesting access to your inbox and no expiration. | |
| May 21, 2012 at 18:36 | comment | added | Arjan | I'm just asking. I couldn't find documentation about how authorizing an app works. (And I am not using any.) Like I saw that SENotifier mentions a login token. Just wondering if it's some "all or nothing" authorization. (But: totally off topic and not related to your question here! By the way: how's your app handling the 𝕌𝕟𝕚𝕔𝕠𝕕𝕖?) | |
| May 21, 2012 at 18:33 | comment | added | jumbo | @Arjan Are you asking me? Or are you trying to remind me of something? | |
| May 21, 2012 at 18:26 | vote | accept | jumbo | ||
| May 21, 2012 at 18:24 | comment | added | jumbo's puppet | 1 more to go... | |
| May 21, 2012 at 16:54 | comment | added | Arjan | Just wondering, as you seem to know about the API: does every authorized application have access to all your data? (The "apps" tab states "remove an app to remove access to your information"; just curious about that.) | |
| May 21, 2012 at 16:45 | answer | added | Double AA | timeline score: 5 | |
| May 21, 2012 at 16:39 | comment | added | jumbo | @YannisRizos Thank to you too. I will do that. I want to have clean sockpuppet ;) (but if this comment-shower will last little longer, maybe I won't need any :D ) | |
| May 21, 2012 at 16:36 | comment | added | jumbo | @Double AA Don't you want to make your comment into answer? I would accept it, as it solves my problem... ;) | |
| May 21, 2012 at 16:35 | comment | added | yannis | @jumbo If you go with the sockpuppet, it'd be nice to include a link to the account in your main account's about box (and vice versa), and of course a sentence or two on why you need the sockpuppet. Also when you're done testing you're app, you should ask the mods (via a flag to one of your posts or through chat) to merge the accounts (which would invalidate any self voting). You know, just to be proper and all... | |
| May 21, 2012 at 16:34 | comment | added | jumbo | thank you @Dennis. I will try to not get in trouble. | |
| May 21, 2012 at 16:33 | comment | added | Dennis | @jumbo: Sock puppets should only get you in trouble in case of voting irregularities. Upvoting a post of one account using the other or voting twice on the same post can get you suspended. Pinging yourself should be fine. | |
| May 21, 2012 at 16:27 | comment | added | Arjan | 𝓞𝓻 𝓽𝓱𝓲𝓼 𝓸𝓷𝓮 (one should really come prepared!) | |
| May 21, 2012 at 16:25 | comment | added | Arjan | T̲̱hi͔̤̤ͅs̺̲͔̞̗ͅ ͕̟͙̭one͙ͅ ͇̫̰̟t̙͚o̙o͚̝͖̯̤̣͙. | |
| May 21, 2012 at 16:24 | comment | added | jumbo | :D Thank you guys. My app seems to work for now :) I didn't know making a sockpuppet is legal, to be honest I didn't know the word sockpuppet :) I will create one, and use this post to spam myself :) Thanks again. | |
| May 21, 2012 at 16:17 | comment | added | Dennis | @Pekka: So, if I need a notification to test one of my extensions, I can just bug you? | |
| May 21, 2012 at 16:09 | comment | added | Pekka | lit-tle lamb. --- | |
| May 21, 2012 at 16:09 | comment | added | Double AA | Her fleece was white as snow. | |
| May 21, 2012 at 16:09 | comment | added | Pekka | Mary had a little lamb, | |
| May 21, 2012 at 16:09 | comment | added | Pekka | little lamb, ---- | |
| May 21, 2012 at 16:09 | comment | added | Pekka | little lamb, --- | |
| May 21, 2012 at 16:08 | comment | added | Pekka | Mary had a little lamb, | |
| May 21, 2012 at 16:08 | comment | added | Double AA | Make a sockpuppet and comment on your own posts. | |
| May 21, 2012 at 16:08 | comment | added | Pekka | This one will, too. | |
| May 21, 2012 at 16:08 | comment | added | chown | This comment will generate a notification for you to test with. | |
| May 21, 2012 at 16:04 | history | asked | jumbo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |