Timeline for Why do I require 15 reputation to just up-vote something?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2020 at 13:30 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| May 29, 2012 at 4:42 | comment | added | spargonaut | Thanks for the input, I wasn't trying to whine, only ask a legitimate question that I was unable to find an answer for. I disagree with 15 reps being easy to get. if they we're, I would have gotten them and been done with it. Unfortunately, a person with 0 rep is rather limited in the things the site allows you to do to gain rep. SEO kids: this method seems to be effective, but a touch overkill. Other methods might include captchas, e-mail verification, community reporting, blacklisting, etc. regardless, thanks for the input and suggestions. | |
| May 29, 2012 at 4:13 | vote | accept | spargonaut | ||
| May 24, 2012 at 13:34 | history | edited | ale | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
fixed typo
|
| May 24, 2012 at 8:59 | comment | added | Manishearth | @RivieraKid: Done | |
| May 24, 2012 at 8:59 | history | edited | Manishearth | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 106 characters in body
|
| May 24, 2012 at 8:55 | comment | added | RivieraKid | Absolutely agree, thought it would be worth clarifying to avoid the OP thinking it's the same as regular voting. | |
| May 24, 2012 at 8:07 | comment | added | Manishearth | @RivieraKid: That's what I meant by "doesn't notify the user". Mods can see the anonymous voting trends, though. | |
| May 24, 2012 at 8:04 | comment | added | RivieraKid | I could be wrong (it's happened many times before), but I believe that the anonymous voting you mention is purely for collecting metrics for potential future features and doesn't even result in a "community" up/downvote. | |
| May 24, 2012 at 5:27 | history | answered | Manishearth | CC BY-SA 3.0 |