Timeline for Tag editing limits - Give us a chance
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
19 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:56 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://raspberrypi.stackexchange.com/ with https://raspberrypi.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:31 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 15:50 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.raspberrypi.stackexchange.com/ with https://raspberrypi.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 24, 2014 at 13:34 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
|
| May 1, 2013 at 19:41 | comment | added | UpAndAdam | Agree with ACarter disagree with Bart. Sorry if I had seen i was CLOSE to the limit i would have stopped and asked first rather than hitting the limit. This seems to be the exact opposite of what is preached to be told to first time contributors. Bart might not forsee it, but that doesn't necessarily mean anything (no disrespect intended). | |
| Jun 22, 2012 at 17:10 | comment | added | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | See Decision on rejected edits should be displayed as a notification to the editor — I think the proper thing to do in this case would have been to provide you discoverable feedback, which is unfortunately not done currently. | |
| Jun 20, 2012 at 16:23 | comment | added | user154510 | If you can't ask or answer anything then you shouldn't have committed to the beta. | |
| Jun 20, 2012 at 16:18 | comment | added | Bart | I don't really see how this question can be answered constructively. Perhaps you can restate it to discuss the visibility of rejected suggested edits under the assumption that, should you have seen the rejections, you would have changed your actions sooner. That would be something to discuss (although there might be a dupe?). With respect to the other issues: you'll get your second chance in 7 days. The temporary inability to earn reputation through edits is not a big concern. And I don't foresee a mass exodus of users because of issues similar to yours. | |
| Jun 20, 2012 at 16:08 | comment | added | Manishearth | @acart private beta privilege levels are lower, so rep really is easier to get. Rack your brains and try to remember all your previous questions about the topic (I did that for chem.SE). You probably made some not-so-good edits in your hurry to get rep. Ask questions, you'll get rep muuuch faster.. | |
| Jun 20, 2012 at 16:04 | history | edited | ACarter | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 248 characters in body
|
| Jun 20, 2012 at 16:03 | comment | added | ACarter | @Manish (Edit ban) When a site is in an early beta, if you can't think of anything to ask or answer, editing is the only way to earn reputation (I know everybody says "reputation doesn't matter", but get real, when you don't have much it matters a hell of a lot). | |
| Jun 20, 2012 at 16:00 | history | edited | Naftali | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 60 characters in body
|
| Jun 20, 2012 at 16:00 | comment | added | Manishearth | Besides, you can still edit your own post, right? Editing isn't that important, someone else can do it. Or is it a complete ban (not just an edit ban) | |
| Jun 20, 2012 at 16:00 | comment | added | Bart | Yeah, I meant "a few days"..7 indeed. | |
| Jun 20, 2012 at 15:59 | history | edited | ACarter | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 7 characters in body
|
| Jun 20, 2012 at 15:59 | comment | added | ACarter | @Bart What do you mean couple of days? It says 7. | |
| Jun 20, 2012 at 15:59 | history | edited | Bart | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 5 characters in body
|
| Jun 20, 2012 at 15:57 | comment | added | Bart | "By the time I am allowed to edit again, the site will have changed dramatically.".. in 7 days...really? Relative to the site's existence that might seem long, but in reality there will most likely not be a huge change. You'll get your second chance in a couple of days. | |
| Jun 20, 2012 at 15:52 | history | asked | ACarter | CC BY-SA 3.0 |