Timeline for Shouldn't downvoted answers on meta be non-transparent instead of semi-transparent?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
40 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 9:43 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackoverflow.com/ with https://meta.stackoverflow.com/
|
|
| Apr 30, 2014 at 22:19 | answer | added | Bruno | timeline score: 3 | |
| S Apr 29, 2014 at 15:50 | history | bounty ended | Bart | ||
| S Apr 29, 2014 at 15:50 | history | notice removed | Bart | ||
| Apr 28, 2014 at 22:01 | answer | added | Shog9Mod | timeline score: 10 | |
| Apr 28, 2014 at 21:55 | history | edited | Shog9Mod |
edited tags
|
|
| S Apr 28, 2014 at 14:56 | history | bounty started | Bart | ||
| S Apr 28, 2014 at 14:56 | history | notice added | Bart | Draw attention | |
| S Mar 20, 2014 at 16:13 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
| S Mar 20, 2014 at 16:13 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
| S Mar 12, 2014 at 14:30 | history | bounty started | Benjamin Gruenbaum | ||
| S Mar 12, 2014 at 14:30 | history | notice added | Benjamin Gruenbaum | Draw attention | |
| S Mar 12, 2014 at 13:57 | history | bounty ended | Stijn | ||
| S Mar 12, 2014 at 13:57 | history | notice removed | Stijn | ||
| S Mar 5, 2014 at 13:53 | history | bounty started | Stijn | ||
| S Mar 5, 2014 at 13:53 | history | notice added | Stijn | Authoritative reference needed | |
| S Mar 5, 2014 at 13:53 | history | bounty ended | Stijn | ||
| S Mar 5, 2014 at 13:53 | history | notice removed | Stijn | ||
| S Feb 26, 2014 at 13:26 | history | bounty started | Stijn | ||
| S Feb 26, 2014 at 13:26 | history | notice added | Stijn | Draw attention | |
| Jul 16, 2013 at 15:28 | vote | accept | Jürgen Thelen | ||
| S Jul 14, 2013 at 5:15 | history | bounty ended | yannis | ||
| S Jul 14, 2013 at 5:15 | history | notice removed | yannis | ||
| Jul 7, 2013 at 21:11 | comment | added | brasofilo | @Jeffrey, brilliant use of the interface to make a point¡ | |
| Jul 7, 2013 at 21:03 | history | post merged (destination) | |||
| S Jul 7, 2013 at 20:53 | history | bounty started | yannis | ||
| S Jul 7, 2013 at 20:53 | history | notice added | yannis | Draw attention | |
| Jul 7, 2013 at 20:41 | answer | added | Benjamin Gruenbaum | timeline score: 37 | |
| May 20, 2013 at 12:57 | comment | added | Shoe | @JeffAtwood, I think it's -3. | |
| Oct 31, 2012 at 0:09 | comment | added | Jeff Atwood | @yannis the threshold is already -8 on all metas AFAIK and has been for a very long time. This is much higher (lower?) than the main sites for that very reason. | |
| Oct 17, 2012 at 15:42 | comment | added | Rob W | @JoshCaswell This one: It is hard to read (comments at) a downvoted answer? | |
| Oct 17, 2012 at 15:07 | history | edited | eykanal |
edited tags
|
|
| Aug 8, 2012 at 4:07 | comment | added | Robotnik | @BenBrocka - Imagine your last comment was an answer. It's not a bad point at all, but the first 3 people to get to it didn't agree with what you said and voted it down. You've already been pushed to the bottom of the answer queue, and now you've passed the "greyed out" threshold as well. The first, fair enough- people don't agree. The second almost smacks of censorship, like the post has no worth. I agree there should be a 'grey-out' threshold (if a post is bad enough it WILL be heavily downvoted) but I thnk the bar should be around -7 as opposed to -3 | |
| Aug 8, 2012 at 4:06 | comment | added | jscs | closely related: Un-fade low score answers on rollover or click, and I swear this is a dupe but I can't find it. | |
| Aug 8, 2012 at 3:46 | comment | added | Zelda | Heavily downvoted meta answers are often "wrong" in one way or another, just like main site answers. It's just that on main your answer is probably terrible because of some more objective criteria, whereas on meta your answer is probably terrible because of some more subjective criteria. They've both earned their low sort order and their "not much to see here" styling in all likelyhood. | |
| Aug 8, 2012 at 2:39 | comment | added | jmort253 |
@YannisRizos - **<search> controversial:1 user:1 would come up with lots of posts now wouldn't it? :)
|
|
| Aug 8, 2012 at 2:17 | comment | added | yannis |
@jmort253 like if it was a controversial statement from Jeff Atwood You mean he makes non controversial ones?
|
|
| Aug 8, 2012 at 1:52 | comment | added | jmort253 | Or at least, if nothing else, put the transparency back to normal when mousing over the content. Sometimes it's necessary to be able to read the answer, like if it was a controversial statement from Jeff Atwood, for instance. | |
| Aug 8, 2012 at 1:30 | comment | added | yannis | Voting on Meta is used to show agreement / disagreement, assuming a quality post. If the post is of low quality, then voting works exactly the same as on the main site. The threshold for semi-transparent answers is -3 (if I'm not horribly mistaken). I guess it would make sense for Meta to have a larger (lower?) threshold, how does -8 sound? | |
| Aug 8, 2012 at 1:28 | history | asked | Jürgen Thelen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |