Timeline for Poor answers shouldn't count towards the accept rate
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2012 at 18:59 | comment | added | bitmask | @Arjan: I do this sometimes. By no means all the time. Also, mostly not on SO. | |
| Aug 21, 2012 at 18:34 | comment | added | Arjan | If you're accepting just for the accept rate, @bitmask, then see "What should I do if none of the answers is suitable?" in How does accepting an answer work? | |
| Aug 21, 2012 at 17:55 | comment | added | bitmask | Fair enough. | |
| Aug 21, 2012 at 17:44 | comment | added | user102937 | @bitmask Any accept rate above 50% is OK. Any accept rate above 70% is excellent. See meta.stackexchange.com/a/16729 | |
| Aug 21, 2012 at 17:41 | comment | added | bitmask | I absolutely agree with your statement about 0%. However, I've more than once accepted an answer just to keep my accept rate in the green (i.e. >80%). That feels like broken design. | |
| Aug 21, 2012 at 17:39 | history | answered | user102937 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |