Timeline for re-accepted answer does not reward +15 again?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2017 at 12:35 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
|
|
| Sep 22, 2012 at 8:51 | comment | added | gnat | @Patrick I personally don't get around CW. As for the reputation, well I try to gain it in less slippery ways. It certainly pains when only about 30 of 350+ upvotes contribute to rep due to CW but I somehow learned to live with this | |
| Sep 22, 2012 at 8:36 | comment | added | Patrick | @gnat so how do you get around the CW status when you find additional issues that relate and can improve your solution! | |
| Sep 22, 2012 at 8:32 | comment | added | gnat | @Patrick hards to say, this is etiquette matter. Copy-paste sounds somewhat slippery, community may dislike this tactics | |
| Sep 22, 2012 at 8:28 | comment | added | Patrick | @gnat, thanks - giving it a shot. If multiple edits lead to CW status, is it better to just c+p an answer to the new question and alter it slightly, rather than to edit an existing answer and point future answers to it? | |
| Sep 22, 2012 at 8:16 | comment | added | gnat | @Patrick if your answer is outstanding and multiple edits clearly indicate exemplary contribution, CW status can be removed from it - see for example this meta discussion at Programmers | |
| Sep 22, 2012 at 8:13 | history | edited | gnat | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 characters in body
|
| Sep 22, 2012 at 6:02 | comment | added | Lucifer | Why not, you should always make your post update ,if you found anything missing. | |
| Sep 22, 2012 at 6:01 | comment | added | Patrick | So, basically, don't bother keeping posts updated. | |
| Sep 22, 2012 at 5:59 | history | answered | Lucifer | CC BY-SA 3.0 |