Timeline for Is correcting a common misspelling too minor an edit?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
24 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2017 at 12:36 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
|
|
| Sep 28, 2012 at 17:45 | comment | added | Nate-Wilkins | Shouldn't their be a moderator flag for site abuse? Not saying this is but if someone is excessively doing edits that could be improved, or if someone accepts everything that comes through then yea maybe.. | |
| Sep 28, 2012 at 17:34 | history | edited | Pops | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Oh, the irony :). Second editor: grammar fixes.
|
| Sep 28, 2012 at 17:29 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| Sep 28, 2012 at 17:34 | |||||
| Sep 25, 2012 at 3:37 | comment | added | nhahtdh | Well, it seems that he has started doing some real edits. | |
| Sep 24, 2012 at 13:23 | comment | added | Barak | Well, he's still going with it. 60+ rep so far today. Hopefully he'll hit the edit rep cap soon and stop. | |
| Sep 24, 2012 at 8:38 | comment | added | Time Traveling Bobby | I'll just leave this link here as reference because it is related and might be of interest (shameless self-promotion, too): Too Minor rejection reason needs either to be reworded or removed | |
| Sep 24, 2012 at 4:43 | answer | added | nhahtdh | timeline score: 6 | |
| Sep 22, 2012 at 17:54 | comment | added | jscs | This seems to happen from time to time: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/116509/…, meta.stackexchange.com/questions/128514/… | |
| Sep 22, 2012 at 16:08 | history | edited | ale | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
trolling != trawling
|
| Sep 22, 2012 at 13:41 | vote | accept | Barak | ||
| Sep 22, 2012 at 12:56 | comment | added | user229044 | I will typically fix the * remainder* of the post via the "improve" button but uncheck the "this edit was helpful", depriving the editor of their small rep gain. This is less than ideal as I lose the ability to tell the editor why I'm rejecting their edit. | |
| Sep 22, 2012 at 12:31 | answer | added | Rosinante | timeline score: 12 | |
| Sep 22, 2012 at 9:32 | comment | added | Bo Persson | Sigh! stackoverflow.com/review-beta/suggested-edits/687660 | |
| Sep 22, 2012 at 8:23 | comment | added | vascowhite | I see there are some revi ewers who never reject an edit. | |
| Sep 22, 2012 at 8:19 | comment | added | vascowhite | I'm getting sick of clicking reject only to be told the edit has already been approved! | |
| Sep 22, 2012 at 8:00 | comment | added | Himanshu | @YannisRizos Correct. But Rejecting suggested edit will also get counted. | |
| Sep 22, 2012 at 6:54 | comment | added | yannis | I guess this is what happens when you give out gold badges for hitting buttons like a blind man in a bowl full of peeled grapes. | |
| Sep 22, 2012 at 6:50 | answer | added | yannis | timeline score: 27 | |
| Sep 22, 2012 at 6:49 | answer | added | avpaderno | timeline score: 29 | |
| Sep 22, 2012 at 6:41 | history | edited | gnat |
edited tags
|
|
| Sep 22, 2012 at 6:40 | comment | added | Barak | Wow, just looked at the guys rep page... 200 rep yesterday with about the same (low, imo) quality of edits. | |
| Sep 22, 2012 at 6:36 | history | edited | Barak | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added more info
|
| Sep 22, 2012 at 6:27 | history | asked | Barak | CC BY-SA 3.0 |