Timeline for Answering tumbleweed questions - a proposal for attention
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2012 at 17:20 | comment | added | RobH | If a question has no or very low upvotes, that could also be du to it being quite niche. Therefore, not a good reason to delete it just because it tumbleweeded. | |
| Sep 29, 2012 at 6:43 | comment | added | SteB | If a question had no answers it is likely quite difficult or quite niche, but still very useful to people if only there was an answer. Up-voting of questions requires rep, there could be considerable interest by people with not enough rep - early on I was favouriting questions so I could up-vote when I gained more rep. Niche questions can go many days (and longer) without getting views, sometimes the tags and/or title can put people off, not a reason to delete in my opinion. OP has 1 rep & hasn't visited the site in X days - good point- not sure what can be done about this. | |
| Sep 28, 2012 at 23:57 | history | answered | walrii | CC BY-SA 3.0 |