Timeline for How should questions dealing with playing cards be tagged, or should they?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:31 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 24, 2014 at 13:39 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
|
| Oct 11, 2012 at 0:19 | history | edited | blahdiblah | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 2160 characters in body
|
| Oct 10, 2012 at 3:53 | comment | added | HostileFork says dont trust SE | +1 as I agree that it is a good tag, and so that is my bias... but I'm wondering if you have any comments on the slippery slope? Look at what @RobertHarvey said about [hangman]...is that an okay tag? (For reasons I don't quite understand, that particular one stands out to me of as the most uncomfortable of his examples; moreso than the slightly questionable [blackjack] or [poker], and I can't make a good intellectual argument for why that particular one rubs me the wrong way...while [tic-tac-toe] does not. :-/) | |
| Oct 9, 2012 at 21:05 | history | answered | blahdiblah | CC BY-SA 3.0 |