Timeline for Should some privileges be awarded when a user gets a badge? [duplicate]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2017 at 12:35 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
|
|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:30 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 24, 2014 at 13:39 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
|
| S Oct 13, 2012 at 23:11 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
insert duplicate link
|
|
| S Oct 13, 2012 at 23:11 | history | closed |
Lorem Ipsum Martijn Pieters animusonStaffMod Toon Krijthe avpaderno |
exact duplicate | |
| Oct 13, 2012 at 21:01 | comment | added | yannis | @Junuxx Obviously! But on the young Beta sites I participate in it's a lot easier to get rep than find something to edit. For example, look at the Workplace (6 months old), quite a few high rep users already, but not even a full page of editors. | |
| Oct 13, 2012 at 20:58 | comment | added | Junuxx | @Yannis: Obviously all users start without rep as well? | |
| Oct 13, 2012 at 20:21 | answer | added | jmort253 | timeline score: 1 | |
| Oct 13, 2012 at 18:33 | review | Close votes | |||
| Oct 13, 2012 at 23:11 | |||||
| Oct 13, 2012 at 17:59 | comment | added | yannis | ...and right now SO has 553 Copy Editors. I don't think the site would survive for long if only 553 people were reviewing edits. | |
| Oct 13, 2012 at 17:49 | comment | added | yannis | Let's say we start a new Stack Exchange site today. Obviously all users start without any badges. Who's reviewing their edit suggestions? | |
| Oct 13, 2012 at 17:42 | history | edited | jcw | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added meat to question
|
| Oct 13, 2012 at 17:36 | history | asked | jcw | CC BY-SA 3.0 |