Timeline for What are Established Users?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
25 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2019 at 19:04 | vote | accept | Joseph Quinsey | ||
| Mar 25, 2018 at 1:48 | comment | added | Joseph Quinsey | Related: How do I participate in Meta and not die trying? | |
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:31 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 9:43 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackoverflow.com/ with https://meta.stackoverflow.com/
|
|
| Apr 24, 2014 at 13:39 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
|
| Nov 14, 2012 at 9:33 | history | edited | gnat |
edited tags
|
|
| Nov 2, 2012 at 12:46 | vote | accept | Joseph Quinsey | ||
| Aug 31, 2013 at 14:59 | |||||
| Nov 1, 2012 at 7:59 | history | rollback | Sathyajith Bhat |
Rollback to Revision 2
|
|
| Nov 1, 2012 at 4:23 | review | Close votes | |||
| Nov 1, 2012 at 14:34 | |||||
| Nov 1, 2012 at 2:15 | comment | added | Joseph Quinsey |
@Jon Skeet: I am extremely appreciative of your comment. And I apologise for the phrase "adult supervision". But that is exactly what I would like. At the very least, perhaps someone could delete everything in this "thread"? But never-the-less, my simple original my seven-word question remains unanswered.
|
|
| Nov 1, 2012 at 1:32 | history | rollback | Joseph Quinsey |
Rollback to Revision 1
|
|
| Nov 1, 2012 at 0:05 | history | edited | avpaderno | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 161 characters in body
|
| Oct 31, 2012 at 23:57 | answer | added | Taryn East | timeline score: 0 | |
| Oct 31, 2012 at 23:24 | comment | added | Jon Skeet | @JosephQuinsey: In the future, you might want to consider some empathy while writing the question. If you were reading a question which called for "adult supervision" because a poorly-researched question had been downvoted, how would you be likely to feel? Criticizing a group of people at the same time that you're asking them for help is rarely a good idea. | |
| Oct 31, 2012 at 22:11 | comment | added | Bart | If you ask what an "Established User" is while linking to a page which explicitly states what it is, people might find your question lacking in research effort. If anything, you might have wanted to clarify what exactly you did not understand or what was unclear to you in addition to the information already provided to you. | |
| Oct 31, 2012 at 22:03 | comment | added | Joseph Quinsey |
I must admit that I am really puzzled and dismayed by the responses to this question for support. For now, have to take my children out for Hallowe'en for now, so I guess I give up.
|
|
| Oct 31, 2012 at 21:42 | comment | added | Bart | On Meta you are not yet an established user. You are 11% on your way there. | |
| Oct 31, 2012 at 21:42 | comment | added | Joseph Quinsey |
It says "established user 11%", presumably from 1000'?
|
|
| Oct 31, 2012 at 21:42 | comment | added | yannis | As for "adult supervision", well the downvote arrow reads: "This question does not show any research effort". And your question didn't, as the answer to it is in the "established user" privilege page, a page you were notified to read when you gained the privilege (on Stack Overflow). | |
| Oct 31, 2012 at 21:41 | comment | added | Pekka | How about both sides chill a bit. Meta users - try to be nice. Joseph - relax, votes here really don't matter, and pay attention to the advice people are giving you, too. | |
| Oct 31, 2012 at 21:40 | answer | added | Madara's Ghost | timeline score: 10 | |
| Oct 31, 2012 at 21:39 | comment | added | Brandon | On the privilege page look to the right. An established user is a user with 1000 reputation. | |
| Oct 31, 2012 at 21:39 | comment | added | yannis | The privilege page sufficiently describe what an "established user" is, what exactly is confusing you? | |
| Oct 31, 2012 at 21:39 | comment | added | Pekka |
Votes work differently on Meta: meta.stackoverflow.com/faq#vote-differences. Re secondary questions, it's not a good fit for the format... do keep in mind what Popular Demand said in your other question: Meta SO users aren't immune to the "downvoting things because they seem too easy/simple/obvious to the downvoter" syndrome. I wouldn't worry about it too much... Meta rep isn't much use. that said, yes, the replies you received were admittedly much less friendly than they could/should have been.
|
|
| Oct 31, 2012 at 21:35 | history | asked | Joseph Quinsey | CC BY-SA 3.0 |