Skip to main content
replaced http://meta.stackoverflow.com/ with https://meta.stackoverflow.com/
Source Link

The "reduced ads" privilege on Meta Stack Overflow requires one rep point. In other words, there are no ads on Meta.

Admittedly, the privileges page here says that you need 200 rep for reduced adssays that you need 200 rep for reduced ads. That's because it's true for the other sites on the network, and the MSO privileges page is a wiki that gets copied to every site.

In other words, there is no bug, it's just bad documentation that's caused by the way the privileges page is set up.

The "reduced ads" privilege on Meta Stack Overflow requires one rep point. In other words, there are no ads on Meta.

Admittedly, the privileges page here says that you need 200 rep for reduced ads. That's because it's true for the other sites on the network, and the MSO privileges page is a wiki that gets copied to every site.

In other words, there is no bug, it's just bad documentation that's caused by the way the privileges page is set up.

The "reduced ads" privilege on Meta Stack Overflow requires one rep point. In other words, there are no ads on Meta.

Admittedly, the privileges page here says that you need 200 rep for reduced ads. That's because it's true for the other sites on the network, and the MSO privileges page is a wiki that gets copied to every site.

In other words, there is no bug, it's just bad documentation that's caused by the way the privileges page is set up.

Source Link
Pops
  • 69k
  • 34
  • 226
  • 359

The "reduced ads" privilege on Meta Stack Overflow requires one rep point. In other words, there are no ads on Meta.

Admittedly, the privileges page here says that you need 200 rep for reduced ads. That's because it's true for the other sites on the network, and the MSO privileges page is a wiki that gets copied to every site.

In other words, there is no bug, it's just bad documentation that's caused by the way the privileges page is set up.