Timeline for How to review posts of neutral quality?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2020 at 13:30 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Dec 7, 2012 at 11:39 | comment | added | sam-w | @RobertHarvey: Fair enough, cheers for explaining :) | |
| Dec 7, 2012 at 2:39 | comment | added | user102937 | To the downvoters: I don't mind the downvotes, but if you have a strong opinion, you might want to give it a voice. This is what Meta is all about, after all. | |
| Dec 7, 2012 at 2:37 | comment | added | user102937 | @acjohnson55: Yeah, I don't think you can incentivize skip; it's too easy to just hit "skip" on everything to get your badges, and people already do this with votes. One always has to be careful of unintentionally creating perverse incentives. | |
| Dec 7, 2012 at 0:55 | comment | added | acjay | That's useful info, thanks. I think the interface should be a little more clear that Skip is an okay response. Also, the fact that skips are not counted towards progress further devalues Skip to the reviewer, in my opinion. | |
| Dec 6, 2012 at 22:58 | comment | added | user102937 | By "valid", I mean that it's actually an answer, and not "me too," "thanks," or "visit my blog to get the answer." I don't mean "correct" or "useful." | |
| Dec 6, 2012 at 22:56 | comment | added | sam-w | Why should a user receive a downvote for a valid answer? That seems unfair to me... | |
| Dec 6, 2012 at 18:04 | history | edited | user102937 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 23 characters in body
|
| Dec 6, 2012 at 17:47 | history | answered | user102937 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |