Timeline for Should we approve minor edits suggested just for the sake of retracting a vote?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2017 at 12:36 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
|
|
| Jan 25, 2013 at 18:14 | vote | accept | animusonStaffMod | ||
| Jan 24, 2013 at 0:35 | answer | added | user102937 | timeline score: 12 | |
| Jan 24, 2013 at 0:21 | answer | added | AndrewC | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 23, 2013 at 23:42 | answer | added | Lance Roberts | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jan 23, 2013 at 23:36 | comment | added | Lance Roberts | Well, they call it a feature... | |
| Jan 23, 2013 at 23:35 | comment | added | juergen d | Editing just for reversing a vote is gambling the system because the lock is a feature IMO. | |
| Jan 23, 2013 at 23:20 | history | asked | animusonStaffMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |