Timeline for Should users be allowed to remove the "Possible Duplicate" links on closed questions?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Sep 6, 2017 at 4:52 | history | edited | Shog9Mod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Yes, this now describes functionality that was added WELL after the change originally referenced here. Oh well, at least I can pretend I didn't write "basic" for no good reason.
|
| S Sep 6, 2017 at 4:52 | history | suggested | CommunityBot | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
updated to reflect current functionality; "kinks" in question have long since "ironed out"
|
| Sep 6, 2017 at 4:50 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Sep 6, 2017 at 4:52 | |||||
| Jun 7, 2017 at 1:10 | comment | added | Shog9 Mod | Not unless the question has been reopened (or re-closed and now has two banners), @Steven. For many old questions, the edited-in banner is the only way for readers to find their way to the target. | |
| Jun 7, 2017 at 0:13 | comment | added | Stevoisiak | Should we remove old auto-generated "Possible duplicate" banners if we see them? | |
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:31 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 24, 2014 at 13:41 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
|
| Jul 1, 2013 at 6:56 | comment | added | Shadow Wizard | @Alan no point in this; moderator can simply re-open and then close properly. Saw it happening few times. | |
| May 31, 2013 at 16:19 | comment | added | Alan Munn | One unintended downside of this solution is that it's now no longer possible to add other (possibly better) duplicates to the list, so whatever ones were suggested by the original closers are fixed unless the question is reopened. Would it be possible to allow mods only to edit the text? | |
| Feb 8, 2013 at 14:53 | vote | accept | gnostradamus | ||
| Feb 8, 2013 at 4:41 | history | answered | Shog9Mod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |